<p>SAT II Scores
-US History: 760
-Biology M: 800
World History :780</p>
<p>AP's:</p>
<p>-World History
-Stats
-English Lang & Comp.
-U.S. History
-Government and politics
-English Lit & Comp (Senior year)
- biology
-Human Geography
-Art History
european History
chemistry
(all 5's)</p>
<p>Which college are you applying to?
-Letters and Science</p>
<p>List a few of your most important ECs (a laundry list of 20+ items is not needed)
-on the board that helps draft the health class curricula
-varsity wrestling
-NHS
-Science National Hornors Society
Mock Trial team
debate team
model UN
newspaper
student government</p>
<p>you have the essentials. however, through reading the posts, many many many students just like you were waitlisted or rejected. focus on your essays. I think Uchicago finds those really important. express personality and good luck :)</p>
<p>I hate to say this, but without the regular SAT scores, you just do not know. The ACT alone is probably not enough. You seem to have a LOT of APs with scores for just two years of AP testing.</p>
<p>I disagree strongly that applicant has outstanding chances. It seems that many are assuming that having great stats means having a great chance at getting in. Quite the contrary. If you’ll observe Brown’s statistics from the class of 2013, while keeping in mind that Brown had an acceptance rate of 11% that year, you’ll see that students with an ACT score of 33-35 were accepted 14% of the time. Since Chicago’s acceptance rate will be about 15 or 16% = 1.5 x 11% = next year, multiply that number by 1.5 and you get 21%. With no other information then, applicant has a chance of acceptance pinned at 21%. (However, even THIS is conservative, because 33 is lowest on the 33-35 scale AND Chicago has higher standardized test scores than Brown on average.) If you really think that 21% chance of getting into a school is great, then your definition greatly differs from my own. OP’s chances will rest mainly on essays.</p>