Chances at these places

<p>What do you think my chances are at UVA, Columbia, Brown, Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Duke, NYU, Cornell, BC, Northwestern, Stanford, Caltech, and Michigan in Regular Action? I have already been deferred from Penn and MIT early.
My stats are:
SAT I: 1600
SAT II:
800 Writing
790 U.S. History
780 Math IIC
770 Chemistry
730 Latin
730 Biology-E
ACT: 35
GPA: 4.0 out of 4.0 unweighted
I've already taken 6 AP exams and I will take 5 more.
AP Scores:
Chemistry: 5
European History: 5
U.S. History: 5
English Literature and Composition: 5
English Language and Composition: 5
Latin Literature: 5
BC Calculus: Not Taken Yet
Physics C: Not Taken Yet
AP Economics (Macro and Micro): Not Taken Yet
Latin Vergil: Not Taken Yet</p>

<p>Not a whole lot in the way of extracurriculars: plenty of JV sports, a medical research project, and 4 years as a Special Olympics coach.
What do you think?</p>

<p>A couple more things: I applied to Wharton at Penn which is more competitive than the College, and also had a legacy there.
Caltech is probably my top choice now though as I am looking to go to a warmer climate than snowy Cleveland, Ohio, where I have attended a nationally known private all boys school since kindergarten called University School.</p>

<p>I hate ppl like u, u make the restof us look bad...</p>

<p>Gah,you are in everywhere.</p>

<p>I'm white by the way, and did you read that I got deferred at MIT and Penn?
Also most of those SAT IIs were freshman and sophmore years if it matters.</p>

<p>Remind me what you're asking?</p>

<p>I'm asking for an apprasal of my chances at:
UVA
Columbia
Brown
Harvard
Yale
Princeton
Duke
NYU
Cornell
BC
Northwestern
Stanford
Caltech- Probable first choice
Michigan
Regular
and my chances of getting into Penn-Wharton and MIT after being deferred early at those two places. I'm sort of glad to have been deferred at Penn though, because I'm a legacy there and I had family pressure to go ED there.</p>

<p>UVA- yes, columbia - probably, brown- maybe, harvard-maybe, yale-maybe, Princeton- maybe, Duke- Probablu, NYU -yes, Cornell-probably, BC-yes, Northwestern -probably, stanford- probably, caltech- maybe, Micigan- yes, Penn-probaly, MIT-maybe</p>

<p>Stanford probably? I love California its my second choice. Two kids accepted from my school early though, one top in class, 36 ACT freshman year, 1600, you can imagine the rest, the other not nearly as strong stats wise as me but with strong EC's, so i don't know</p>

<p>At my school, out of a class of 90, 2 kids in early at Stanford, 1 at Princeton, 2 at Yale, 1 at Harvard, 1 at Columbia, 1 at MIT, 1 at Duke, 1 at Cornell.</p>

<p>my friend from Iowa got into stnford EA but she got a 1590 SAT but i did better than her SAT II for everything else except writing, u can see my stats on this board, shes a good writer tho but nothing uncommonly grea abour her</p>

<p>He has a 1600..and a 4.0..and all that stuff...how can a school be a "maybe"???</p>

<p>those schools turn away plenty of 1600's</p>

<p>I want input on the essays, though it is close to being too late.
Essay One:
Volunteering with the Special Olympics over the last four years has been enjoyable, but it has also been challenging and troubling. As I have gotten to know the adolescents in this program, I have delighted in their triumphs and agonized over their struggles.
Last year, Mr. Williams, the coach of the team, decided that we would play the season in a unified format, in which I would play in games along with the mentally handicapped teens in the program. Even though we sometimes were unable to win against the older teams, the experience of the season brought me and my teammates joy. One particular memory shines through as my favorite not only in my time volunteering with this team, but also as the happiest of my entire career in sports. We were down one point with ten seconds remaining in the game. My teammate Antoine was at the foul line with two shots and the chance to win the game. Antoine made both shots, and the next thing I knew three of my teammates were coming over to jump on me, and we all celebrated on the court for a long time. I had never seen the team, and especially Antoine, so happy. The next week at practice, the team was still talking about the great last-second win.
There are other instances, however, when I’ve become sad while volunteering with the Eagles. I was very upset during this year’s first practice, when Henry, another player on the team, kept soiling himself on the court. I could see the shame and embarrassment in his face. I felt compassion and sympathy, but I could do nothing to help Henry control his bodily functions and take away his pain. It was at that moment that I realized how deeply I cared about my teammates. Another disturbing moment came when Mr. Williams and I were talking while my teammates were taking a water break. I asked what the people in the program go on to do once they graduate, by then young men. I was disappointed when he told me that they sort clothes at Goodwill, if they are lucky, and remain living with their parents, or even worse, in my eyes, move to a residential facility for the mentally handicapped. I was crushed, because I wanted something better for them. I wanted them to experience the pleasures of usual adolescent rites of passage, like forging out into the world on their own. I wanted someone to be able to help them lead “normal” lives.<br>
I have been forced to realize the limitations of my ability to help and accept the reality of these adolescents’ lives. I have come to understand the value of spending my time volunteering with the Special Olympics. Though, sadly, I am unable to change my teammates’ disabilities, I am able to contribute towards the goal of helping all the players become more aware of their own worth and proud of the courage they exhibit in their lives.<br>
Essay Two:
Many editorial writers lament the current state of political discourse in this country. They have complained recently about the so-called rise of the “politics of personal destruction,” claiming that constant character assassinations distract from the issues at hand and turn off would-be voters from the political system. I disagree with these editorials. I think that character assassinations are a fundamental part of campaigns in a democratic society, and not an entirely undesirable one. We should consider ourselves fortunate to live when character assassinations result in harsh exchanges of words and not bloodshed.<br>
Popular opinion is that partisanship is currently at an all-time high and civility at an all-time low throughout all levels of political discourse. To evaluate these judgments, it is important to consider history. The reality is that character assassinations in political campaigns are thousands of years old. In antiquity, political campaigns featured fierce attacks on the characters of candidates for office. In fact, the Romans were known to take the “politics of personal destruction” past verbal attacks right to physical assault. In one of the more famous episodes of Roman history, Marc Antony, upset by character assassinations written against him, ordered the hands of Cicero cut off and so that they would never again write attacks against him.<br>
In more modern times, even in United States, the history of politics is marked by intense struggle and personal conflict. One of the best known examples of character assassinations is the duel between two of the founding fathers of the American Republic, Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton. Burr was so upset over Hamilton’s defamatory statements that he demanded a duel, which ultimately ended in Hamilton’s death. Another example comes from 1856, in the middle of the contentious debate over slavery. In a rare departure from usual Senate courtesy, South Carolina Rep. Preston Brooks delivered a beating on the floor of the upper house of Congress to Massachusetts Sen. Charles Sumner, believing him to have slandered Senator Andrew Butler. Though politics by its very nature is alive with conflict, today’s personal attacks are clearly less violent than those of past eras.
If the modern version of character assignation is careful scrutiny of candidates’ pasts and aggressive distribution of information via television advertisements, then I believe this is how it should be. Politics is not just a debate over issues. As a citizen, I desire leaders who will be effective, honest, intelligent, consistent, and compassionate. I ought to know the characters of candidates for public office because I have a vested interest in electing the right candidates. To that end, the system as it is encourages mass distribution of information about candidates and trusts voters to make informed decisions for themselves. Running for public office is a decision to open up one’s life for public scrutiny. Candidates should be accountable for their past actions and indiscretions, and voters should demand that candidates show their true characters.<br>
Essay Three (Caltech):
I never had to “discover” Caltech per se because the school has such a prominent national reputation and I’d heard of Caltech for many years when I visited the campus in January of 2004. I decided to apply to Caltech primarily because of its outstanding academic reputation for excellence in math and science and the personalized attention that is guaranteed by an astounding 3:1 student-faculty ratio. There are a number of other factors that also make Caltech my first-choice place to attend college: the emphasis on collaborative education, the numerous opportunities for undergraduate research, the core curriculum for freshmen and sophomores, and the Southern California location.
At least from what I’ve heard about Caltech, I don’t think I fit the profile of most students in that I don’t aspire to a career in engineering; rather, I have always dreamed of working in the business world. Though Caltech is not known as a business-oriented school, in my opinion a degree from Caltech is the best undergraduate preparation for a job in today’s economy. The line between engineering and business is blurring because of the technology-intensive nature of today’s economy, and it is likely that business will be even more technologically dependent in the future. Engineering is more than just a course of study; it is a way of thinking. The mentality instilled by the Caltech core curriculum is invaluable in the business world. The practical, analytical, and systematic way of problem solving taught at Caltech is a great preparation for any career, and, I believe, an especially great preparation for a business career.
Because I have a different career aim, or at least intended field of study, from those of the majority of Caltech students, I think I bring diversity to Caltech in terms of having different aspirations. At most colleges, majoring in economics doesn’t contribute anything because economics is the largest department, but at Caltech, majoring in economics boosts the enrollment of a small department. I would try to get to know all of the students in my class so that I have a connection with everyone and also so that I meet those most compatible with me and form close friendships. I believe that I would fit in at Caltech nicely.
I would bring a high degree of intellectual curiosity and academic achievement to the Business Economics and Management department. I love getting up every day and going to school, and I love to gain new insights. Though my passion is for business and quantitative finance, I would bring enthusiasm and eagerness to learn to all my classes. I would seek out personal contact with professors and I would like to take advantage of the research opportunities available to undergraduates. I would also seek out opportunities for original individual research.<br>
Another passion of mine is politics: I would get involved in political organizations and try to increase political awareness and involvement on campus. Community service is something that I would pursue as well. I would want to volunteer within the Caltech community as well as in the wider community, and I would try to encourage others to participate in community service, because community service benefits one’s self as well as others. I hope to be able to bring my passion, energy, and enthusiasm to the California Institute of Technology community.</p>

<p>UVA-Yes
Columbia-very good chance
Brown-very good chance
Harvard-pretty good chance
Yale-pretty good chance
Princeton-pretty good chance
Duke-Yes
NYU-Yes
Cornell_Yes
BC-Yes
Northwestern-Yes
Stanford-Most Likely
Caltech- Possibly
Michigan-Yes</p>

<p>Just venturing a guess, but I assume it's the essays that did you in for MIT and Penn. Not saying they're bad, but they lack that "umph."</p>

<p>I dont think it was the essays at all. I just think that you were too good for penn, and they didnt accept you because you would probably have chosen a different college at the end, and you would have reduced their yield, and their rankings.</p>

<p>Your stats are impeccable, but...
you need to learn the purpose of a topic sentence in your essays.</p>

<p>agree on the topic sentence comment, I got the idea in the opening paragraph.. but as previously stated it didn't have the umph.</p>

<p>
[quote]
I just think that you were too good for penn

[/quote]
</p>

<p>First of all, he applied to Wharton, which is the most competitive and prestigious business school in the country. So, it's impossible to be "too good for Penn."</p>

<p>Secondly, colleges like Penn don't do that.</p>