Chances

<p>Background:</p>

<p>Asian in CA attending school with average SAT of 1000
Economic Status: around 20k per year & 1st generation college-bound</p>

<p>Academics:</p>

<p>GPA: 4.0 (unweighted)
Class Rank: 1 or 2/380
SATI: 2120 - M 790, CR 670, W 660
SATII:
World History 800
United States History 790
MathIIC 750(predicted)
Physics 700(predicted)
AP:
AP World History 5
AP Calculus AB 5 (predicted)
AP US History 4 or 5 (predicted)
AP Physics 4 (predicted)
AP EnvSci 4 or 5 (predicted)
AP English Language & Composition 3 or 4 (predicted)</p>

<p>Major: Undecided</p>

<p>ECs:
JV Tennis 2 years
Science Olympiad 4 years
President in Key club 1 year
Member of Key club 3 years
~100 hours of community service (at hospital)
Computer tech/accounting internship over summer
CSF 4 years
NHS 1 year</p>

<p>Awards:
3 Science Olympiad regional medals</p>

<p>Other:
Essays & recommendations are solid</p>

<p>1 AP class sophmore year: AP World History
5 in junior year: AP Calc AB, AP English Lang, AP Physics B, AP Enviro Sci, AP US History
7 in senior year: AP Calc BC, AP English Lit, AP Physics C, AP Comp Sci A, AP Stats, AP French, AP Macro/Micro Econ</p>

<p>Taking most rigorous courseload in school. </p>

<p>What are my chances and what needs the most improving?</p>

<p>I'd say 95% chance of admission...I don't think u will need much improvement for Vanderbilt</p>

<p>gpa 3.52 unweighted
no weighted or class rank
honor society and many extra curricular
long island new york competetive school
attending vanderbilt pave program this summer</p>

<p>sat:
verbal 710
writing 700
math 800</p>

<p>sat2:
molecular biology 710
american history 700
math 2 770</p>

<p>ap courses:
european history
american history
biology</p>

<p>senior year ap
government
economics
calculus bc
physics</p>

<p>all other courses have been honors</p>

<p>what do you think?</p>

<p>good i am in a very similar position (chicago, competitive school, similar scheduale, 2210 sat, 3.7 unweighted, sat 2 of 780, 680, 750, and many ecs) From what i have heard from vandy people and my counsler, i have a very good chance of admittance. i think vandy values test scores more than some other top schools, so that will help us (we are above the top 75%) and we dont like in the south (diversity).</p>

<p>Actually, no. Vandy did not emphasize test scores and really, really tried to look at each applicant holistically, which needless to say required significantly more effort. The admissions dean, who unlike many of his peers, was cognizant that behind each applicant was a real person. The NEW admissions dean this year, however, seems like he'll be pretty hardcore. good luck.</p>

<p>(The old admissions dean was recruited by another school that fit him better. A small liberal arts college where he had administrative responsibilities so that he could participate in influencing the direction of the school.)</p>

<p>who--
curious as to why you think the new admit dean will be paying much more attn to the scores?
i would say given his background from public u that he'd be overboard the other way to prove he's up to the task.</p>

<p>im not sure how the new dean will be, but the old dean definitely looked at the whole picture. not just test scores.</p>

<p>idk i was just comparing princeton review material</p>

<p>Hardcore doesn't necessarily mean he'll pay more attention to test scores. He's not going to go overboard in either direction, regardless of where he came from. Based on his interview after being introduced as the new dean, he appears to have a very singular focus: to improve vanderbilt quickly...and be pretty hardcore about it. Also, princeton review is a joke.</p>