<p>it's not terror because if it were, then the kid wouldn't have gone back (in the story he did more than once, albeit with adults)</p>
<p>did anyone choose a-chronological for one the answers...i cant remember what passage it was...</p>
<p>Abject terror was way too extreme. Abject is extreme and terror is extreme, so the choice is extremely extreme :P</p>
<p>why i still don;t feel good even though i answered correctly to the questions u guys just discussed about? and i still dunno which section is experimental for me >.<</p>
<p>Junior you mean a answer Chronicles?</p>
<p>here's a link to the 'hair poets' story
<a href="http://www.don-lee.com/yexcerpts.html%5B/url%5D">http://www.don-lee.com/yexcerpts.html</a></p>
<p>HAHA ... the line that comes directly before the passage excerpt in the SAT says:
That *<strong><em>! Caroline said. That conniving Korean *</em></strong>! Shes moved here on purpose!
crtl-f and look it up; i dont want to get into trouble with collegeconfidential</p>
<p>gotta love the SAT</p>
<p>it makes me really wonder if Maricella set the shed on fire or if Caroline did it?</p>
<p>Maricella...did seem kinda ****ed about Caroline's poems being good !_!</p>
<p>AHHHHHHHHHHh, what are your theories?</p>
<p>lol, they definitely were careful about the part of that story they picked!</p>
<p>I'm pretty sure it was growing unease. He did venture back in with adults and he enjoyed playing the game where he would turn around and see it looking at him. If it was abject terror he probably would have just bolted. That's just my opinion though.</p>
<p>I remember this question on the Cheetah taht had 2 possible answers regarding why theories dont work. Was the answer something like "Because Theories in labratories that work dont necessarily work in the real world?</p>
<p>yea thats what i meaan...did u guys get a)chronicles for one of the answers?</p>
<p>Yep. I put that down for one of the sentence completitions.</p>
<p>I don't know. For the Vemeer passge, I still think that the child was seeking "companionship". The child want to be with the adults. I guess "security" would work too but I don't think he was really SCARED of the painting. He was nervous, and the passage kind of implied that he was "curious". That's why he went back to the room so many times. </p>
<p>If not, then in that CR section, I got two questions wrong. Not fair. Those two questions were kind of realted. I chose "companionship" for the second part only because I chose "curious" for the first part. Darn it. I shouldn't have thought too much. At first I put "growing unease" and "security". Dang it.</p>
<p>lol, I always overthink the questions too. I'm very sure it was unease and security though.</p>
<p>I can't wait for the scores! I wonder how I did.</p>