<p>Atm, i'm torn between these two classes. For those of you who had read my post from 2 days ago, you'll know that i was waitlisted for johnson for chem 6c. Giving up all hope, I started going to the Kubiak lectures, assuming I wasn't going to get in Johnson after being on the waitlist at position #1 for a whole week. Lo and behold, I wake up to find that I'm off the waitlist but the problem now is i have already added phys 2a with dudko and they are both at the same time... </p>
<p>pros of chem 6c
-i feel johnson is a much better professor than kubiak in terms of teaching. ( went to a kubiak lecture and frankly, not my taste)
-Dropping physics 2a will lighten my load from 20 to 16 units.
-Chem is easier than physics from for me
-physics 2a DI/PB has minor conflicts with my schedule (not FINAL related) </p>
<p>pros of phys 2a
-I am retaking this class and it feels much easier than Schuller's
-Afraid of taking it next quarter with the "smarter" incoming freshmen >_>
-i am an engineering major... sooner or later, right? </p>
<p>Either way, i intend to take chem 6c this quarter (reason for the 20->16 units) just that i think johnson>kubiak. maybe not grade-wise, but I just feel I will learn a lot more from johnson. (plus i had her for chem 6a)</p>