<p>I am planning to take either chemistry or us history in june. My problem, however is that I have learned limited information in U.S history(regular class) and also learned nothing hard in my chemistry honors class.</p>
<p>Which of the two would be easier to self-study in a 2 months?</p>
<p>It depends on whether you’re a science person or a history person.
IMO, U.S. history would be easier to study because it’s more straightforward. It’s mainly chronological events and why it happened.</p>
<p>I’m even.lol. In my opinion, U.S history would seem easier to study. I’m only taking chemistry honors and we’re going really slow, compared to Chem AP.</p>
<p>I also heard theres a generous curve on the U.S History one?</p>
<p>US History does have a generous curve, and it isn’t really necessary. I finished with 10 minutes to go after not finishing either Math 2 or Chem.</p>
<p>And I’m a prospective math major, for the record.</p>
<p>Definitely US History. A lot of the stuff you probably know already so even if you didnt really know the right answer, you could still use some common sense to guess.</p>
<p>I’m in AP Chem right now and I don’t see how you can take the SAT II Chem without completing a year of AP Chem…there’s quite a bit of stuff that needs to be covered. It would be really hard to learn by yourself.</p>
<p>I think I will go with US history. I don’t even need SAT II’s, my top choice is cal poly slo. They don’t require sATII’s. Ugh, I wished UC’s didn’t require them as well.</p>