<p>I’ve been sort of watching this debate with interest and I think I can chime in as someone whose kids have been on all angles. This is a long post, so if you aren’t interested, please feel free to skip!</p>
<p>My S is my third child to apply for acting programs. Each of my kids has had different goals and different needs, so what they want is individual. However, here’s my two cents:</p>
<p>First, for us, cost is not just a consideration; it is a deal breaker. My non-theatre D was accepted to her then-top choice, RISD (a top art conservatory), but they gave no grants/scholarships. At the price then, $56,000/year, it was impossible, and my D had to decline (she ended up at Williams, where she is about to graduate this year </p>
<p>So yes, cost matters. However, it is impossible to know beforehand which colleges will end up giving you merit/need based/talent grants, and which won’t. There are three factors: how much they want you, how much money they have at their discretion, and your need. Our own strategy has been to apply to programs first and see afterwards whether it ends up being affordable.</p>
<p>Secondly, about reputation. My kids have all had the fortune of getting into top-regarded colleges— My oldest went to a top ranked school, my theatre D is at Northwestern, and my S is currently fortunate to be accepted to top conservatories.</p>
<p>That said, I honestly think fit matters the absolute most. Above reputation. As someone said here, what good is being in a top program if you are miserable? This is NOT - repeat NOT - a criticism of his school (this could have happened at ANY college) - but it was not a match for my S. It was such a bad match in fact that not only did he end up leaving, but he is no longer pursuing acting at all. Of course, this may well have happened in any case, but it certainly didn’t help that the school wasn’t a match. In retrospect, it would have been a lot better for him to have gone to a nurturing, liberal arts school for his BA in theatre, probably not a top competitive one–something very different from what he applied to. So for him–what was the good of being in a top program if he wasn’t suited for it?</p>
<p>If you are in a ‘lower’ ranked school but you are thriving, and it is the perfect place for you, you may very well end up not only healthier and happier your four years of college, but more successful once you graduate. I realize there is a desire to categorize acting like sports - I have seen it before here - but trust me, the two career trajectories are entirely different on many levels. </p>
<p>My older D carefully considered fit for her applications and fortunately wound up at Northwestern, where she is very happy, thankfully. There are some programs my S didn’t apply to because the fit would have been wrong for him, including some top places. And I’m sure there are places he didn’t apply to where he would have been very happy. </p>
<p>No matter what college, there are almost always professors who can mentor you.It’s hard getting a job at a college no matter what its ‘rank’. If the student cultivates connections, has a positive learning attitude, takes advantage of all the college has to offer, he/she can get an absolutely top experience pretty much anywhere. Honestly, even if you major in non-theatre at a ‘regular’ university, you can easily get a top education; if you need to, you can enhance your education with voice and dance lessons, either on campus or off, apply to summer stock and internships, and if you can, to a semester abroad for further training. There are just <em>so</em> many different paths to success. Yes, being in a top BFA MT program gives you the leg up in some ways. But it has to be a good fit for you and you have to cultivate the connections there. And if you’re not in a top program, you can truly find success–which anyway is different for each person.</p>