I would think, if anything, that because the 10/24 test was easy, and resulted in lower scores for those students taking it, this may have skewed the overall number of higher scores lower.
Second confirmation of a student with a 220 making it in PA! My daughter received the info from her GC this afternoon. He told her they’d just received the mailing this morning.
10% of the students took the 10/24 test so I’m not sure if that’s enough to skew the overall results. It does seem so far like a pretty “flat” year though I don’t think we have enough information to say for sure. It’s a little interesting to me that the percentage of students scoring in the 1400-1520 range increased, but we aren’t so much seeing increases in the cutoffs to go along with that.
Can anyone list schools that pay for a nmsf (or NMF down the road) to fly in for a visit? I know UCF was offering that but not sure if still true. Alabama does not correct? ASU?
@rileygrl - I am a parent of two ASU Barrett students. Contact Barrett’s Admissions department. They have a “schedule a visit” button on the webpage. My DS was reimbursed a fixed amount based on our zip code. The reimbursement covered airfare for him. The admissions advisors can let you know how much they will reimburse. They do a great tour complete with sit downs with professor (s) in your major and Deans .
ASU pays 100% of tuition, guaranteed to cover any increases. There is travel and research funding allocated to you also. You need to cover books, Room and Board.
@CrazyCatMama - Congratulations to your daughter and thanks for the confirmation! My son has a 220 in PA and I was sure the score was going to go up this year.
Oh, I agree it’s not clear whether 10% of scores would have had an impact. I just think it’s more likely that than the suggestion that perhaps the 10/10 exam was disproportionately difficult.
My son took the 10/24 test and only missed 3 total (-2 writing, -1 reading) and got a 218 index (1470 sat-scaled). I think that test mirrors what is happening overall with the SAT. They are technically easier tests, but one wrong answer (particularly in math) and you lose 30-50 pts. So what this does is bring more kids up, but condenses the test-takers into a tighter group and those scoring at the top truly aced it. It used to be you could miss a few even in math and still get an 800. This allows for them to differentiate at the high end between kids who miss zero vs. those who miss a few.