Class rank meaningless without ranking schools!

<p>I really think the other thread about rank in class being more important
than GPA is totally braindead. It may be true that some Adcoms look at it
that way. But those who know better don't.</p>

<p>Let's take an example. You're comparing two applicants
1. A student from Princeton or Berkeley in the top one-third of the class
2. A student from Chico state (sorry)in the top 2% of t6he class
Who do you think has a better shot at success in grad school
at a leading business, med, or law school?</p>

<p>When you're comparing students across high schools, it gets even worse.
The top one-third in the top 10% of california public schools have
near perfect GPA's. In some schools, you get a single B and your
class rank can drop to 50 out of 400, outside the top 10%!
These schools don't weight GPA's for class rank. So there can be
valedictorians with 4.0 GPA and no AP classes with class rank 1/400.
There ca be kids with A's in AP classes and a B in a regular class
ranked 50/400.</p>

<p>Class rank does not mean the same at a Whitney, or La Canada, or
Lowell or (Stuy?) or just an average school in anytown, america.</p>

<p>I completely agree. I was recently looking at merit scolarship info for TCNJ and several other schools and one of the requirements for money was top 10-15% of class, yet none of them said anything about taking into account the competitiveness of the HS. When you go to a HS that accepts less than 20% of applicants and only has 50 students per grade, obviously it's going to be extremely difficult to be in the top 10% of your class. A student at Podunk HS, on the other hand, with 300 kids per grade and only 60% of those are even going on to college, should not have a hard time getting into the top 10% of his class. This seems incredibly unfair to me.</p>

<p>Colleges like TCNJ certainly do consider the strength of the high schools. </p>

<p>Remember, you have to be admitted first, before you can be considered for the merit aid.</p>