<p>i have around a month i guess to study for bio. i'm currently in ap bio and we just started cell division. </p>
<p>im debating if i should get cliffs or barrons??? any advice?</p>
<p>how’s 5 steps for a 5 for sat bio?</p>
<p>bumpppppppp</p>
<p>i’m using barrons to prepare for the november SAT. not really satisfied. i found a few mistakes. not like typos, real mistakes concerning biological stuff. i sent them an email about a month ago, no reply. and there are only 2 practice tests, that’s not really enough in my opinion.</p>
<p>Princeton’s + Kaplans = all the info you’ll ever need. You can easily do Kaplan’s in a week or two and you can do Princeton’s in one day. </p>
<p>If you can wait though, I’d hold off on taking SAT II Bio until after your AP exam since you’ll learn 90%+ of the stuff on there from the course alone and it makes studying and understanding concepts a whole lot easier.</p>
<p>the problem is i’m a senior.</p>
<p>i think i might end up using barrons b/c my friend gave it to me the other day and i dont really have the money to buy a new book.</p>
<p>btw xnamelessx, can u point out some mistakes you found?</p>
<p>it says in the chapter on biochemistry that all monosaccharides have the formula C6H12O6. according to my knowledge, this isn’t true. i go to school in germany and most of my classes are a lot more advanced, almost college level. i’m not familiar with the american curriculum, so maybe you don’t learn about other monosaccharides in high school, but nevertheless, saying that they ALL have that formula is just wrong. one example is ribose, the sugar that is found in RNA. </p>
<p>and then there were a few mistakes in the answers to the practice questions. i’m guessing those were just typos, though. like it said that C was correct, but the explaination is telling you why E is the correct answer oO</p>