<p>When the presidential race started I really didn't mind Hillary Clinton, but now I think she is being incredibly unfair. She is now arguing the delegate from Florida and Michigan should be in fact counted as they are, without even a revote. In the case of Michigan Barack Obama and John Edward removed their names from the ballot and spent no time in either state whatsoever-- i mean what is the point if theres no delegates. In my opinion, its like starting a monopoly game by saying boardwalk doesnt count at all, and then once you land on it and buy it, changing the rules to say boardwalk is the most powerful property in the game--sucks for you. If Clinton wins by using cheap tricks like these, I would go so far to say I would vote for McCain. Any thoughts?</p>
<p>Beot** .</p>
<p>obama is also trying to change the super delegate rules...</p>
<p>But I agree, clinton is looking desperate and I really don't like it.</p>
<p>Well, I heard somewhere that Barack wants to break the rules and not have the superdelegates count. It wouldn't be fair to break the rules in one case and not break them in the other.</p>
<p>Personally, I like Barack, but like I said, can't have it both ways.</p>
<p>You are completely correct. She has been using tricky, deceitful manuevers like this since the begining of her campaign. She thinks that since she is married to a popular, past president she can do whatever she wants. Thats the only reason she stayed with him anyway...</p>
<p>I think Obama is merely stating he believes that the Superdelegates should vote how the elected delegates vote. I don't think he is petitioning the democratic party to change to rules to make this happen.</p>
<p>*Hell*ary belongs in the kitchen.</p>
<p>^^^^^^yes Suh!</p>
<p>^^She is crazy, but I would support a female in the White House...</p>
<p>Me too. I believe Clinton specifically belongs in the kitchen.</p>
<p>I may be sounding bitter, and I really dont mind Clinton's policies that much, but I just think its funny that one of Clinton's chief strategist serves on the Democratic Party's rules committee and voted to strip Florida and Michigan of their delegates. Yet now that Clinton really needs Florida and Michigan he states that it was unfair to do this, that he made a mistake, and that the two states should be counted.</p>
<p>Oh, she belongs somewhere other than a kitchen...</p>
<p>A brothel?</p>
<p>Eww, who would want her?</p>
<p>Bill .</p>
<p>She has him under a spell...</p>
<p>Actually, he probably married her for publicity (good family, good education, etc.). Obviously, though, she wasn't fulfilling all of his needs...</p>
<p>It wasn't until recently that I discovered all the reasons that I dislike Hillary so much. Thanks for showing your true self Hellary.</p>
<p>Good piece in the Times of London about the lengths the Clintons are planning to go to acheive victory: </p>
<p>Do-or-die</a> Hillary turns bully as Obama starts to pull away - Times Online</p>
<p>None of this should come as a surprise to those of us who have been following New York State politics since 2000. Hillary has a core of admirers in the Democratic Party but the overwhelming feeling you get from the rank and file party people is one of fear -- similar to the fear instilled in the Republican hacks by Zenia Mucha at the behest of George Pataki. Don't be fooled, contemporary NYS politicians are a bad breed. Best to keep a distance.</p>
<p>Harold Ickles is the DNC guy who voted to strip FL and MI of their delegations. Of course, now that he's on the Clinton campaign team, and Clinton "won" both states, he's had a change of heart. <sarcasm> Of course, it was a totally logical and principle-based change of heart, not a political calculation. </sarcasm></p>
<p>
[quote]
[quote]
Eww, who would want her?
[/quote]
Bill.
[/quote]
No he wouldn't - that was the point of Monica Lewinsky! ;)</p>