This is confusing the colloquial expression “random” that means unpredictable with true randomness. You seem to believe that admission decisions are actually akin to rolling dice, that the outcome after evaluation of letters of rec, gpa, essays, test scores, transcript is indistinguishable from putting the applicants names into a hat and drawing them out.
Furthermore you continue to make the mistake of trying to apply a population measure (eg. of the total number of applicants with perfect scores, how many get in?) to a particular individual. This is a well-known statistical fallacy called the “ecological fallacy”.
Lastly, that pronouncement race is “clearly a factor.” Did you read his essays? His letters of rec? The interviewer comments? His transcript? Other factors known to influence admission include where the applicant lives, nature of ECs and leadership/awards, relationship of the HS with the college, alumni status, financial donations made by parents and relatives, the courses taken while in HS. Without knowing anything about this for either the applicant in question or how he compares to the other kids with 2400’s, you conclude that it must be race. This seems to say more about you than about the state of the world.