Colleges grouped by selectivity rating

<p>Here's the PR description of its methodology:</p>

<p>Admissions Selectivity Rating</p>

<p>This rating measures how competitive admissions are at the school. This rating is determined by several institutionally-reported factors, including: the class rank, average standardized test scores, and average high school GPA of entering freshmen; the percentage of students who hail from out-of-state; and the percentage of applicants accepted. By incorporating all these factors, our Admissions Selectivity Rating adjusts for "self-selecting" applicant pools. University of Chicago, for example, has a very high rating, even though it admits a surprisingly large proportion of its applicants. Chicago's applicant pool is self-selecting; that is, nearly all the school's applicants are exceptional students.</p>

<p>^I.E. they make it up as they go along.</p>

<p>Here's a list that someone did with regard to this year's admit rates (can't vouch for the accuracy of the nos.).</p>

<hr>

<p>Admit Rates for 2011 w/ US News Ranks for top 20 universities and top-10 LAC's. </p>

<ol>
<li><p>Harvard 9.0% (2 Univ) </p></li>
<li><p>Princeton 9.5% (1 Univ) </p></li>
<li><p>Yale 9.6% (3 Univ) </p></li>
<li><p>Stanford 10.3% (4 Univ) </p></li>
<li><p>Columbia 10.4% (9 Univ) </p></li>
<li><p>MIT 12.3% (4 Univ) </p></li>
<li><p>Brown 13.5% (15 Univ) </p></li>
<li><p>Dartmouth 15.3% (9 Univ) </p></li>
<li><p>Pomona 15.8% (7 LAC) </p></li>
<li><p>Penn 16.0% (7 Univ) </p></li>
<li><p>Caltech 16.0% (4 Univ) </p></li>
<li><p>Williams 16.0% (1 LAC) </p></li>
<li><p>Swarthmore 17.0% (3 LAC) </p></li>
<li><p>Amherst 17.5% (2 LAC) </p></li>
<li><p>Duke 19.1% (8 Univ) </p></li>
<li><p>WUSTL 20.0% (12 Univ) </p></li>
<li><p>Cornell 20.7% (12 Univ) </p></li>
<li><p>Notre Dame 23.1% (20 Univ) </p></li>
<li><p>Northwestern 23.5% (14 Univ) </p></li>
<li><p>Emory 26.0% (18 Univ) </p></li>
<li><p>U of Chicago 34.9% (9 Univ) </p></li>
</ol>

<h2>Missing: Johns Hopkins (16 Univ), Rice (17 Univ), Vanderbilt (18 Univ), Wellesley (4 LAC), Middlebury (5 LAC), Carleton (6 LAC), Bowdoin (7 LAC), Haverford (9 LAC), Davidson (10 LAC), Wesleyan (10 LAC).</h2>

<p>With regard to admit rates (and student profile), it is helpful to note that the disparity in class size plays a not insignificant role (say - Cornell v. Dartmouth); some schools have more of a self-selecting applicant pool (UChicago); and some schools give out copious amounts of merit aid and overly use the waitlist to pump up their nos.</p>

<p>Let's see: the JHU admit rate this year is 24.2%. I think the Williams number is wrong; should be 17.4%.</p>

<p><em>cough</em> WashU.</p>

<p>I hate how so many people decide how good a school is based on how selective it is.</p>

<p>Here's a link to many of these admit rates from Hernandez Consulting <a href="http://www.hernandezcollegeconsulting.com/resources/early2007statistics.html%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://www.hernandezcollegeconsulting.com/resources/early2007statistics.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

<p>k&s has it just about right...</p>

<p>CMC more selective than Harvey Mudd...?</p>

<p>I hope PR can see beyond acceptance rates... acceptance rates and selectivity are not always the exact same.</p>