<p>Nice perspective, and more to the essential points. Indeed the most important difference may be the impact of the city on the degree of connectedness one is likely to have to campus and student life.</p>
<p>There are those who love being in the city, with all it offers. But there are also those who may feel that the effect of the city can drain the spirit of the collegiate atmosphere, and would prefer to feel their college years are spent on a campus with their fellow students instead of stranded on the sidewalk. To paraphrase something I read.</p>
<p>“Going to school in a big city provides access to tons of outside options … Broadway for theater, some of the best muesums in the world, pro sports, shopping, clubs, more and bigger concerts, etc.”</p>
<p>Absolutely true, but D2 rarely wanted to go to museums, after going once or twice, and she found that most of those other things she actually wanted to do cost quite a bit of $$ on a student budget. Her report (confirmed by Columbia nephew) was weekends everyone trooped off campus, and this always cost $ and she found it boring after a while to boot. Now instead of going downtown to clubs, or whatever it was they were actually really doing most of the time which was not going to museums, she’s more likely to be going to friend’s house parties in collegetown (for free) or doing stuff on or near campus, or in town for that matter. In all cases it is lower key, more intimate, and cheaper.</p>
<p>Here’s an excerpt from another current post elsewhere on CC:
“While there are some free and cheap things to do in NYC, I didn’t like being a poor student there during the '80’s. Yes, I could get standing room tickets, wait for free evenings for museums and the once a semester “Urban New York” opportunity (free tickets to an activity paid for by alumni or the college), but it’s hard when you are conscious of so many things going on and you just can’t afford to do/see them.”</p>
<p>It’s not like there’s nothing to do in Ithaca. I recently looked, the same movies were playing there as were playing here in NYC suburbs. There are bars there, there is sports, there is theater, there is music, not any comparison whatsoever to how much, but many there find it sufficient (most of the time) given the other demands on their time, and it is likely to be economically feasible to enjoy what’s there. I just checked one current tour, the same concert, from the same artist tickets are half the price in Ithaca vs. NYC.</p>
<p>But IMO much more important than the cost is how the nature and connectedness of campus life changes in the two environments, as you indicated. That’s what D2 would say, in answer to #32 above.</p>