<p>I hear that some colleges are already posting the expected yield based on the students' confirmation so far for 2008. Have you seen anything like that for columbia? Any info?</p>
<p>I've never heard of Columbia doing that, and I'm not sure why they'd have any reason to publicly release this data. It can't possibly serve any benefit for them to do so.</p>
<p>I'm not gonna lie...</p>
<p>At the time I was drawing up my college list,</p>
<p>UChicago, berkeley were my matches.</p>
<p>My safeties:</p>
<p>NYU Stern,
University of Michigan-Preadmit for Ross (I did the app in 5 hours, accepted)
"Cornell"</p>
<p>Wait, truazn, was that meant as a response to my "what were your safeties?" thread? Not sure what it has to do with Columbia's 2008 yield. But anyway, why is Cornell in quotation marks?</p>
<p>Whoops wrong thread for comment above sry guys</p>
<p>Has the acceptance deadline passed? They wouldn't be able to offer any meaningful statistic before then. Most colleges are anticipating lower yield this year in light of Harvard's RD shenanigans. I believe Columbia was in the 50s last year, so it'll probably be around there again.</p>
<p>
[quote]
in light of Harvard's RD shenanigans.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Explain please... I only follow Columbia news unless it's posted here.</p>
<p>I think he just means the fact that Hahvahd and P-ton canned early admissions.</p>
<p>Yes, that's what I was after. Shenanigans!</p>