Com'on help me out here

<p>I'm sorry, Mom! It completely slipped my mind!</p>

<p>The little ones LOVED the little ones (in both directions). The girls could not leave the cats alone, and they kitties kept coming back for more. It was awsome! :D</p>

<p>Yep. Cats reduce blood pressure. They also cause spontaneous laughter at their zany antics. :D</p>

<p>As for McKinney, don't you find it delicious that EVERY TIME a liberal loses an election, even to another liberal, it's due to "election fraud"? LOL!</p>

<p>She deserved to be flushed. Talk about an embarassment to the country....</p>

<p>Zaph, I agree McKinney certainly was an embarassment to her party and Congress as a whole.</p>

<p>McKinney needs a few sessions with Dr. Phil...</p>

<p>...somehow Republican Congressman Randy "Duke" Cunningham was left off the list:</p>

<p>Randy Cunningham, navy ace in Vietnam, two Silver Stars, Purple Heart, convicted felon serving eight years in federal prison for accepting $2.4 million in bribes from military contractors in exchange for pressuring the Pentagon to buy their products and services.</p>

<p>stay tuned, this investigation continues--excellent article in August 2006 issue of Vanity Fair about the scandal. "...his (Cunningham's) case exposed a world of bribery, booze, and broads that reaches into the Pentagon, the C.I.A., and Congress. Washington is wondering: Who's next?"</p>

<p>Yep. Let's hope the entire defense establishment gets dragged down just so the libs can get their orgasm. :rolleyes:</p>

<p>I guess Cunningham being tossed into the cooler like he deserves isn't enough for these people. Nope, we have to salivate at the thought of bringing the CIA, the Pentagon, Congress, and everyone else we can down with him.</p>

<p>I rest my case that liberals couldn't care less about the country, so long as they get their power back.</p>

<p>bill,
excellent advice.</p>

<p>Yeah. Just stick your fingers in your ears and go "LA LA LA LA LA LA LA" when faced with the truth, right?</p>

<p>How very grown up of you. :rolleyes:</p>

<p>We’ve all read the stories about soldiers’ families scraping together money to send them body armor that the government failed to provide early in the Iraq war; marines killed in Humvees because the vehicles didn’t have heavy armor plating; enlisted families living in poverty because the soldier/marine doesn’t earn much. So, when Americans are making the “ultimate sacrifice” in Iraq and Afghanistan; and increasing numbers of American citizens are living below the poverty line, I am pretty disgusted by Randy Cunningham’s insatiable greed and criminal behavior. Evidently the government felt the same way since Cunningham was sentenced to eight years in federal prison.</p>

<p>
[quote]
I am pretty disgusted by Randy Cunningham’s insatiable greed and criminal behavior.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>So am I, and everyone else I've heard discuss the matter, including old friends of his, members of the military, veterans, and even the EEEEEEEEEVIL conservative talk-show hosts. What's you're point?</p>

<p>As for all the rest of your post, remember it next time your beloved Democrats demand cuts in the military. The only reason they don't do it now is because they know it's political suicide.</p>

<p>House Vote on National Defense Authorization Act, FY 07
(Yeas/Nays)
Republicans: 225/2
Democrats: 181/17</p>

<h2>(Senate vote most likely in late fall 2006)</h2>

<p>House Vote on National Defense Authorization Act, FY 06
(Yeas/Nays)
Republicans: 225/2
Democrats: 164/37</p>

<p>Senate Vote on National Defense Authorization Act, FY 06
(Yeas/Nays/Not Voting)</p>

<h2>98/0/2 (one from each side didn't vote) </h2>

<p>Source:
THOMAS
In the spirit of Thomas Jefferson, legislative information from the Library of Congress</p>

<p><a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://thomas.loc.gov/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

<p>I reiterate: They are smart enough to know that voting against it (unless you live in a hyper-secure district) is political suicide.</p>

<p>You'll note that quite a few of them still felt it was OK to vote against it in a time of war.</p>

<p>As for the two republicans, I bet they were RINO's anyway.</p>

<p>I really like these debates. Most of the people on here are intelligent enough to know that, just because we disagree we're not killing each other, we're just disagreeing. Call it discussing, argueing or whatever, it's still not the end of the world when posters disagree or even snipe at each other.</p>

<p>KP10sMom said "this forum is being utilized as a place to widen the divides between two groups of American people as well as to make such ill chosen remarks." I don't see it. How does it widen our divides by bringing these things out in the open and discussing them? I guess it comes back to the "intolerance" issue that's being bandied about lately. Intolerance is just a way of saying you're a bad person because you don't agree completely with me.</p>

<p>Keep up the spirited debate. Those who don't like it can ignore it. There's a lot of other good information on this forum without damning the whole thing becasue some people disagree.</p>

<p>"They are smart enough to know that voting against it (unless you live in a hyper-secure district) is political suicide."</p>

<p>Maybe they just thought it was the right thing to do? I mean, it is just possible that the Democrats and moderate Republicans actually love this country and even support the troops! Heck, I'll bet even most of the neo-conservative types do as well! The political hysteria that is drummed up on a daily basis by the extremists on both sides sometimes drowns out the fact that most Americans find themselves agreeing with points on both sides of the political spectrum---I would submit that love of country is right at the top of that list. "MOST" Democrats do NOT "hate" George Bush, nor do they "support Hezbollah" which seems to be the never ending tirade coming from the neo-cons these last few weeks. "Most" Republicans do not want to thrust this country ino some kind of Big Brother facist regime, despite what I hear many leftist talk show hosts say. I hear more about the liberal "hatred of George Bush" from conservative talk show hosts than I do liberals. I hear an awful lot about "do you support "the war" or do you not?" as if the War on Terror could somehow not be supported by the people even if they don't agree with Iraq. We live in dangerous times, and the psychological operations of both extremes are working overtime to keep most Americans herded into their respective political "pens" like sheep without regard to the consequences.</p>

<p>
[quote]
Maybe they just thought it was the right thing to do?

[/quote]

Yeah, and if pigs had wings, Congress would be an airport.</p>

<p>They thought it was the right thing to do, yet they turn around and, especially in light of recent events in Britain, Italy, and Pakistan, acuse the administration of "politicizing terror".</p>

<p>Yeah. They thought it was the right thing to do. :rolleyes:</p>

<p>
[quote]
I hear more about the liberal "hatred of George Bush" from conservative talk show hosts than I do liberals.

[/quote]

Sure you do. :rolleyes:</p>

<p>Go over to DemocraticUnderground, DailyKos, MoveOn, HunfingtonPost, etc. Listen to the Charlie Rangles (who just compared Bush to Fidel Castro), and the others on his side of the aisle. You'll hear it all the time.</p>

<p>That is, of course, if you're willing to listen.</p>

<p>
[quote]
We live in dangerous times, and the psychological operations of both extremes are working overtime to keep most Americans herded into their respective political "pens" like sheep without regard to the consequences.

[/quote]

Yeah. Too bad the psychological extremes of the left are actually working to HELP our enemies. Deny it if you like, but it's true.</p>

<p>But hey, the media isn't liberal either, remember? Just ask them. </p>

<p>Oh, that's right! That's just another "neocon" lie! :rolleyes:</p>

<p>"enlisted families living in poverty because the soldier/marine doesn’t earn much."</p>

<p>Because an E-1 to E-3 salary was not meant for someone who couldn't cut it in the "real" world and decided to go join the military after they were already married and with children. If you look at the pay an E-1 gets it is more than enough for an 18 year old out of high school which is what that paygrade is for. </p>

<p>An enlisted person actually makes pretty darn good money if you actually look at their pay and all the other benefits they receive. There are many enlisted people who are making much more money than I do as an officer right now.</p>

<p>And remember: those poor enlisted guys were all making $100K a year until Bush and Cheney showed up and slashed their salaries to below-minimum-wage levels in order to give their friends in Halliburton big contracts. :rolleyes:</p>

<p>Wow.</p>

<p>You just proved my point.</p>

<p>I like you Zaph, you stick to your guns, but you are so entrenched in the "party line" you can't even acknowledge the fact that loyalty and love of country is not the exclusive bastion of those who think only as you do. </p>

<p>Have a super weekend folks!!</p>

<p>
[quote]
I like you Zaph, you stick to your guns

[/quote]

Thanks. That's because I once believed in "moderation" and many things that are openly liberal, and over the years have come to the conclusion that all those positions are complete hogwash, either being wildly idealistic or completely twisted due to lack of a willingness to face facts.</p>

<p>I know what I believe, and why. That tends to **** some people off. Never, however, have I claimed to be perfect. I am willing to listen to reasoned and factual counter-arguments. All too often, those don't come. You're one of the few who comes pretty damned close, and even succeeds on occaission.</p>

<p>
[quote]
but you are so entrenched in the "party line"

[/quote]

What party? You think I don't slam Republicans when they deserve it, even the President? I am an equal-opportunity criticizer. I have opposed the President on campaign finance "reform", his rediculous spending on non-defense items, and border security (or the lack of it, and I know because I LIVED on the damned border for the better part of a year, crossing it daily).</p>

<p>I call them like I see them, no matter what the party.</p>

<p>
[quote]
you can't even acknowledge the fact that loyalty and love of country is not the exclusive bastion of those who think only as you do.

[/quote]

"Exclusive", no. There are exceptions. The most recent and best-known examples are Joe Liberman and Zell Miller. Look what their love for their country has gotten them. Miller is openly despised, and Lieberman was just thrown out on his ear by the same people who are now begging him not to hurt them by running as an independent. Talk about hutzpah! </p>

<p>Sorry, Shogun, but the modern Democrat party is completely unlike the party that existed during WWII, or even during the early 60's, when politics ended at the water's edge and America came first. Nowadays, the DNC is a bastion of what's left of the socialistic/communistic/anti-American left, so much so that many "moderate" Democrats are beginning to not only ring the alarm bell, but HAMMER on it in a crazed frenzy, that the Michael Moore kook fringe of the left has hijacked the party. It has, and it shows.</p>

<p>Permit me to return the compliment. I like you, too, not because I agree with your views (which, for the most part, I think are wildly idealistic), but rather because you argue your position rationally. That is another characteristic that has completely failed the Left. Castro (a mass-murderer who people risk their lives to escape from) is a saint, but Bush is the new Hitler and books are written about how to assassinate him, yet SILENCE comes from the DNC to call it extreme. How can a group like that be taken with anything but open contempt?</p>

<p>Just the other day, Howard Dean called for the President of Iraq to not be allowed to speak on the floor of the House because he did not openly condemn Hezbollah. He called him an anti-Semite. A few days later, a senior Democrat member of Congress (name escapes me) refused to condemn Hezbollah. Joe Lieberman has been the target of some of the most viscous anti-semitic comments you can imagine, FROM HIS OWN PARTY, and yet now Dean remains silent, and he's the friggin' CHAIRMAN of the party!</p>

<p>You expect any thinking person to take those idiots seriously?</p>

<p>You don't fit that description, I'm very happy to say. Not even close. Hell, you're not even a Democrat. Certainly not the way they define themselves today. I can respect an honest difference of opinion while seeking a common goal. They have none of that.</p>

<p>
[quote]
Have a super weekend folks!!

[/quote]

Likewise, buddy. Stay safe. :)</p>

<p>It was John Dingell, Democrat from Michigan. "I don't take sides for or against Hezbollah."</p>

<p>241 American servicemen murdered, but he can't take sides? :confused:</p>

<p>Yeah, and I bet he supports the troops, too. :rolleyes:</p>