This is my second go around with a son looking at WPI and Rose-Hulman; for the first son, considerations were initially the “feel” of the campus and later, practicality. However, for the second son, the details matter on some key distinctions that we think we’ve picked up on, but that haven’t really been mentioned in comparison threads I’ve seen. So I’m hoping that some of you can help us to know if we are sizing the two up correctly along these three dimensions. (I apologize for the formatting; I couldn’t bend it to my will.)
-
Focus on undergraduate education
Rose is undergraduates only; WPI is an R2-level research university where about 1/3 of the students are graduate students. The professors at Rose at are Rose because they want to teach undergrads, and that makes a huge difference in how they view and interact with undergrads. The question I asked the tour guides at each college we visited the first time around (Spring 2018) was, “How accessible are the professors?” The response at WPI, Northeastern, and Univ of Rochester was: “Oh, very accessible. They have to have at least 2 [or some other number] office hours a week.” Ugh. Answer at Rose: “Mostly, they have an open door policy and they are happy to help anytime.” Also, when the subject of professor accessibility came up in a meeting with a professor at Rose, she took us out of her office and pointed down the hallway to a study lounge with 5 or 6 students sprawled around it. She said they have study lounges like that scattered in amongst the faculty offices so that if students are working on problem set, they can just zip down the hallway and pop their head in and get help; they can do that 10 times in an hour if that’s what it takes to get them understand the material.
Rose faculty are engaged in research, but it seems they engage in research so that they can better serve the students; research betters their teaching instead of competing with it. A professor giving a presentation as part of an open house said that he does research because doing research keeps him excited about his subject matter (excitement which he can pass on to the students), doing research keeps him up-to-date in his field (so he is presenting the most current content), and doing research gives him ways to get students involved in research. That didn’t seem to be the mindset of the professor at WPI that we interacted with, who, sadly, seemed to view teaching undergrads as a necessary inconvenience.
Also, because there are no PhD students at Rose (as there are at WPI), there are not legions of grad students serving as TAs and instructors for lower-level classes. I asked at Rose about who did the instruction for the first-year calculus sequence, and I was told that they break the first-years up into classes of 25 students, and every class has a dedicated professor taking care of everything having to do with that group of 25 students. Wow. -
Society-focused versus job-focused
WPI seems focused on and committed to making the world a better place, as indicated by their admissions materials, their IQP requirement (especially the types of IQP projects), and the Great Problems Seminars that are offered to first-years. Rose, in contrast, seems largely silent on anything relating to societal issues; I went back and re-watched all of the Rose admissions videos (because this matters to Son 2), and the closest they come to anything relating to societal issues is saying that students like to do community service, accompanied by video of some event building and/or fixing bikes. Last year Rose did start the Noblitt Scholars program, which has the stated goal of equipping students to use their “passion and energy to solve national and global challenges;” the example areas of interest are “sustainability, infrastructure, cybersecurity, or health care” (Noblitt Scholars Program | Rose-Hulman). However, this scholarship program is by competitive application after admission, and it is unclear what support in this direction is available to students who don’t make it into that program. It seems somewhat telling that WPI highlights various stories of students making a difference in people’s lives (e.g., making light fixtures for corrugated metal houses using 16 oz water bottles filled with bleach solution); Rose, on the other hand, seems to consistently highlight info about people working at SpaceX, Amazon, and Google. -
Non-STEM requirements (i.e., Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences)
For WPI, it seems it’s 8 classes total. You have to take 3 courses in one of six areas (e.g., music, philosophy), and then you have to take a seminar (which includes a mini-thesis) or a practicum (think mini-recital) in that same area. So you have to commit 4 classes to one HUA area, which can really work against you if humanities and arts aren’t your thing, but political science or economics is. You also have to take 2 additional HUA classes, one of which has to be in a different grouping. And then you have to take two classes in social sciences (e.g., economics, political science), but one of those is already fulfilled by the required pre-IQP class (which is apparently quite a bit of work). (Also, WPI has a PE requirement equivalent to one course, but Rose doesn’t that I can find.)
For Rose, it seems it’s 9 classes total (directly comparable to WPI’s 8, since both schools are 12 courses a year). Two of those are writing (first-year class and a technical writing class); the only restriction on the other 7 is that you have to take at least one class in two of the three areas of study (Humanities & Arts, Social Sciences, Modern Language). So, you could take 6 economics classes and 1 class in Humanities & Arts, or you could take 7 classes in 7 different areas. Much more flexibility than WPI.
It would really help to know to what extent we’ve sized these things up correctly, and it would be great to have any additional info anyone can supply along these dimensions. Thanks.