<p>@ Zinokey and Zenbadabing, it didn’t say in the scope of the ENTIRE passage, the question, in my memory, talked about ONLY that sentence… And that sentence only talked about women and their husbands, not women in general. </p>
<p>(I remember swinging back and forth between those two answers: A and E I believe).</p>
<p>For the women’s suffrage passage, I think some of you forget the actual question. </p>
<p>It was this: What was the logic of the men who were opposed to women suffrage? </p>
<p>That Women SHARED the same views as their husbands
or
Women would not vote INDEPENDENTLY of their husbands. </p>
<p>Was there any evidence AT ALL in the passage that suggests these men believed that ALL women had the EXACT SAME views as their husbands. Of course not, that would be preposterous.</p>
<p>montage is definitely “more completely than a single thing but still inadequate”…the passage said nothing about how a montage could be less realistic than a single element</p>
<p>and that women/husbands voting one i put women would not vote independently from their husbands</p>
<p>From the other CR post, to make it more… easy to access. </p>
<p>Sentence completions
Cerebral
Inapt … odd
Disregard … cosmopolitan
Nuance
Garner … Enigma
Precipitous
Digress
Munificence
Magnanimous
Prolific
Register … environment
Object to … repeal
Momentous … trivial
Truce
Lucid
Resist … recognition
Influential
Accomplishment
Pedestrian.. edfying</p>
<p>Short passages
Women suffrage passage
Women will not vote independently of their husbands.
To show how a prediction was incorrect</p>
<p>Mixed-up senses passage
Fine in context means satisfactory</p>
<p>Shakespeare passage
The tone of passage 2, compared to that of passage 1, is more irreverent.
The last sentence of passage 2 is the humorous one (can someone reproduce the question. I remember the answer had something to do with poking fun at people for not being knowledgable of Shakespeare’s works.)
Both passages agree that Shakespeare is a genius. (Industry is also a previously debated choice)
Familiar in context means easily recognized</p>
<p>Long passages
Jewelry passage
The similarity between mass-produced jewelry and that of Art movement was “more affordable”
The guild’s approach was a practical means to their ideal.</p>
<p>Chinese mother passage
The things that mom kept were familiar objects (or keepsakes?)
The passage shows narrator’s transition from the tradition of her parents
The Chinese mother feels isolation.
The second paragraph describes the extent of her transformation.
The first sentence of the third paragraph shows the central idea that would be later developed.
The first paragraph describes the routine lives of parents.</p>
<p>Pipe painting passage
The painting is not the object it depicts.
The way college professors teach students the painting is simple and debatable.
Montage??
Tentative
The paradox is the painter simultaneously depicting the painted object and the real object.
The view that brain is not monolith is to show how we perceive the world differently.
The extraterrestrials, flat-earth theory were to show extreme views.
Appreciate in context means recognize.</p>
<p>Automobile passage
Disturbed in context means troubled.
What were the differences between passage 1 and passage 2? Passage was more even-handed to a phenomenon.
The transportation cannot be blamed for everything in the destruction of city.
The tone of the quote is wry.
Hypothetical scenario is shown in passage 2.
“Jaywalking” shows a characterization.
Lines … (from passage 1) and lines … (from passage 2) illustrate a problem.</p>
<p>China passage- it’s familiar associations not keepsakes. they’re all new experiences that remind her of china, not things she actually brought from china</p>
<p>about the automobile section another question said smth about the 2nd paragraph of the 2nd passage.i was between mock a prevailin situation or describe a situation.can anyone help??</p>
<p>and also about the cosmopolitan i think it is incorrect.it was pragmatic.</p>
<p>for the cars one there was a question like how would author 1 respond to author 2’s “noplace” comment</p>
<p>some answer choices were like “accurate description of current state,” “amusing exaggeration of an unusual problem” …</p>
<p>what’s the answer to this one?</p>
<p>also another sentence completion was about some guy incorporating “naturalistic” elements to dance compared with other people’s “studied” poses and gestures</p>
<p>for the boston one, there was one like “how would the author of passage 1 respond to the statement of a particular section of passage 2”. and i believe the answer was he would have agreed blah blah. (it was a quote from passage 2 saying how cars cause problems)</p>