<p>For Bio Molecular i've heard Barrons is better and i've heard PR is better, i can't seem to decide which is better and for US history is Barrons better or Kaplan. Thanks in advance.</p>
<p>for bio
i used both pr and barrons</p>
<p>pr doesnt have somethings that barrons have (eye, ear) </p>
<p>read pr first then skim barrons</p>
<p>thats what i did</p>
<p>bump 10 char</p>
<p>I definitely recommend Barron's for Bio. Helped tremendously today.</p>
<p>I must note though that I also purchased PR for World History, and although it certainly helped with increasing my knowledge of the subject, how everything was ordered chronologically and the structure of the book as a whole made the retainment of specific details difficult imo. But then again, I didn't have time to take any practice tests out of the book which I'm sure would have been useful.</p>
<p>In retrospect, hopefully my WH score isn't too bad. :(</p>
<p>i used barron's for US history, the practice tests are MUCH harder than the actual thing, which helps prep you for the real thing. plus their answer explanations for the 8 practice test (so nice to have so many) are great. their structure is good imo.</p>
<p>but i guess we'll see come the 23rd ;)</p>