In one math/computer science class we were asked to redo one famous math problem.(Sorry for not specifying it as I don’t want to be identified.) In class, professor taught us a way of doing it and I’m pretty sure that’s how everyone else in my class did it, as they were just coping the way we were taught in class and handed it in.
But because I had learned a lot about probability on my own, I did this problem a different way and I’m 100% certain I got the correct results and the correct conclusion.
The professor didn’t understand my work and marked that my figures were wrong even though I generated the same conclusion. So I went up to him after class a few days ago trying to get him understand.
Unfortunately it didn’t end well. Before letting me explaining myself he was already so ready to start “here’s why you were wrong… blabla”
The moment he started talking I knew for sure that he did NOT understand what I did and he did NOT know anything about probability himself. So I kinda forced him to listen to me, which he did.
After he understood my work, he started saying “Oh I never said your technique was wrong. It’s just you didn’t give me the figures we needed. That’s where you were wrong.”
But the question of this project is to propose that in a certain scenario, we should choose to do A or B. As long as I still concluded that we should choose A (which is the correct conclusion) and provided accurate mathematical calculations and figures, I don’t see why he could say I was wrong just because I didn’t prove it by the way he showed us in class.
I knew that he marked me wrong in the first place because he didn’t understand my work at all. I wrote out everything nicely on the paper with diagrams and everything, so I’m pretty upset when I got the results back and realized that I actually got a lower score than others for doing extra work.
He even said this to me: “You only got 30 seconds to prove to a decision maker. Now, we’ve spent 15 minutes already and you still can’t explain yourself well. How would you think your work was good enough?”
And that, made me SO MAD. Sorry for being so vague here but I’m pretty sure if I lay out everything here, whoever knows about probability will know I’m right. (p.s. this course isn’t probability. But this question is.) And it wasn’t that hard either!! That’s why I felt so bad about it; it’s like I was punished by being too smart than what the professor was asking for.
It also scared me that this argument with him could possibly affect my grades as in this class we were just doing several projects and he’s the one giving out grades.
Maybe it’s a very common thing in universities for students to get into arguments with their professors. But as a minority female I’m just not used to it. I’m not used to being on “bad terms” with professors, and that makes me feel uncomfortable. Or did I do the right thing to defend myself, even though it didn’t end well?
Any thought would be appreciated. Thanks.