Cons of UCLA?

<p>smallest campus- but most number of students.</p>

<p>People despite being the smallest campus, honestly, take a look at the size of other UC campuses. They go beyond 1000+ acres. For 460+ acres UCLA is on, that is pretty good because look at the IVY leagues. Their size is smaller than UCLA and to tell the truth, UCLA is on VERY expensive property so I am actually surprised we have this much land.</p>

<p>UCLA has really good food... better than berkeley. But UCLA has no where near the amount of land as Berkeley...</p>

<p>I don't know about that rExRuN467. Cornell's campus, for example, is 745 acres. Princeton also owns 1077 acres for academic purposes although its campus size is smaller.</p>

<p>Yeah I meant the 30,000 students, not the geographical size...</p>

<p>cornell is like half empty though</p>

<p>It's not how much land you have, it's how you use it.</p>

<p>Look at Hong Kong and Singapore.</p>