<p>“Then you should have nominated a better candidate!”</p>
<p>Why do I get the feeling that, had Clinton been nominated, we’d be having an argument that differed on the talking points but was basically the same?</p>
<p>“Then you should have nominated a better candidate!”</p>
<p>Why do I get the feeling that, had Clinton been nominated, we’d be having an argument that differed on the talking points but was basically the same?</p>