<p>WellMeaningDad (and some of this is for early college too)...I would not get too caught up on the term "conservatory." In my opinion, your son would have to first decide if he wants to do a BA or a BFA program as there is a major difference between those two options. I have read various posts of yours and some schools you have brought up are a BA and some are a BFA. </p>
<p>In a BA program, majoring in theater is like any other college major, where the major is approximately 30% of your total coursework. In most BA schools, you are not committing to the major upon application or matriculation. You may change majors. You may double major, etc. There are a few BA theater programs that do accept via audition, however, even if they are a BA (examples: American, Fordham, Marymount Manhattan). But most BAs do not have an audition to get in, though their theater programs are very well regarded (examples: Northwestern, Brown, Skidmore, Brandeis). In a BA, the student will study a broad range of subjects in the liberal arts curriculum. At some schools, you may major in theater, which requires the number of credit hours as any college major. A BA student would not have as many theater courses as a BFA degree program. About 30% of the coursework would be theater courses, with the rest being general education courses and electives. There is the possibility of a minor or double major with another subject. There are less hours in class and more outside of class required. There is an opportunity to study more subjects and get a broader education. A BA is appropriate to those who are not ready to make the long time commitment to theater and allows for a change of major. The student is not locked into a professional training program. A BA program is much more flexible than a BFA program. One factor in choosing this route is also finding colleges where there is not only a theater department but also a very active theater scene with many performance opportunities, both faculty directed and student directed. </p>
<p>In a BFA program, the applicant must be 100% committed and positive of this major as it is a committment from the outset upon matriculation. There is always an audition to get in and the acceptance rates are very low making it quite competitive. The BFA major takes up at least 65% of the coursework but this can vary from school to school and so in some programs, the BFA training may represent 70-85% of the coursework. It is a rigorous type of professional training and the student attends far more class hours than a BA student. Most BFA programs have SOME liberal arts (but not as much as you would get in a BA program) but the amount varies from school to school. For instance, the BFA in Acting at NYU/Tisch has more liberal arts required than the BFA at CMU, NCSA, or Rutgers. So, an applicant would have to examine the degree requirements and curriculum and compare/contrast between schools and this usually can be found online for BFA programs. Where "conservatory" comes into it (in my opinion) is simply that some schools are stand alone conservatories (example, Julliard or NCSA) and so the majority of the time is in conservatory with very little liberal arts but even those schools have a tiny bit of liberal arts required for the degree (but not a large array of offerings). But many other BFA programs are conservatories (or the style of conservatories) within a larger university setting. So, I would not get caught up on the word "conservatory" as much as deciding between a BA and a BFA and then deciding if you want a stand alone conservatory or a conservatory within a university/college setting and lastly, examine the liberal arts requirements which differ from BFA to BFA and may be as much as 35% or as little as 10% of the overall course requirements. But the liberal arts will not nearly be as much as in a BA program. </p>
<p>But a BFA is VERY intense and it is only appropriate for students who only want to pursue theater and be immersed in it. If a student has a few interests, a BA is a much better path and a person an still become a professional actor with a BA degree. Further, for someone pursuing acting, a BA plus an MFA is a very viable career path vs. a BFA. This is less of an option for someone wanting Musical Theater as there are very few MFAs in MT but there are lots of great ones for Drama/Acting. For BFA programs, admissions are highly selective and competitive. These programs are for students who want to focus on theater and are sure they want to pursue this intensive training and professional degree program. Some BFA Acting programs offer more liberal arts than others. Some BFA schools allow for a minor in another subject, but many do not. Few may allow a double major but this is very difficult and not as common. There are fewer courses in the students overall curriculum in liberal arts than in theater training. It is for students certain they wish to pursue this career. It is a very rigorous program and is an immersion. BFA programs involve far more hours in classes than BA programs though less hours of preparation outside of class as a rule. Much of the curriculum is outlined for you with fewer choices of courses. A BFA is appropriate for someone who cannot imagine doing anything else but to become a professional actor. They want to spend a major portion of their college years in both training and production work in theater. </p>
<p>So, this is the main decision your son needs to make before looking at specific schools. </p>
<p>IF your son wants a BFA, I would encourage you to not strictly confine the options to the Northeast as it is not like a regular student picking a college from hundreds of options. There is a finite number of BFA in Acting programs and you have to go where they are, even if you have some geographical preferences. </p>
<p>You asked for BFAs in Acting on the East Coast no further south than DC (not sure how far off the Coast you are willing to go)....but here is a list of SOME (NOT ALL):
***Note, these range greatly in both artistic selectivity, as well as in academic selectivity, and thus these would not all be viable options for your son and you'd have to assess if he was in the ballpark academically for each school, as well as apply to a range of artistically selective schools, let alone have BA (non audition) back up options that are academic safeties and not simply just a BA. </p>
<p>Juilliard
Carnegie Mellon
SUNY Purchase
NYU/Tisch
Boston University
Rutgers University
Emerson College
Ithaca College
Syracuse University
Point Park
CCM
UArts
Otterbein
University of Hartford (Hartt)
UConn
Montclair State
Marymount Manhattan
Pace
SUNY Fredonia
SUNY Buffalo
Wright State</p>
<p>While not in the West, these schools are a little out of your geographic range but I'd encourage that if your son wants a BFA:
UMiami
North Carolina School of the Arts
U of Michigan
Elon
Roosevelt
Webster
DePaul
U of Minn. Guthrie
University of Evansville
Florida State
Illinois Wesleyan
Shenandoah</p>
<p>There are quite a few other very good ones but I eliminated the West or deep South. I also did not give you EVERY school that offers a BFA in the East or Midwest. </p>
<p>If your son is looking at BA schools known for good theater in the East (and I'll include some mid West but will eliminate the deep South and the West which does knock out some really good options):
Brown
Vassar
Northwestern
Yale
UNC-Chapel Hill
Fordham (by audition)
Boston College
Skidmore
Wesleyan
Emory
Sarah Lawrence
Brandeis
Muhlenberg (optional audition)
Conn College (optional audition)
Catholic Univ.
Indiana Univ.
Kenyon
Cornell
Middlebury
Tufts
Drew
Fairleigh Dickinson (by audition)
American (by audition)
Marymount Manhattan (by audition)
Penn State (by audition)
Temple (by audition)
Manhattanville (optional audition)</p>
<p>There are some schools where you enter as a BA student and then after one or two years, you can audition into a BFA track....including:
Hofstra</p>
<p>While still eliminating the West:
Tulane</p>
<p>Again, I can think of other great options that don't fit into your strict geographical parameters. </p>
<p>Early_College.....you asked about "voice" as a course requirement at CMU. NO, it is not singing. And no, it is not Voice Over class. Most quality BFA programs have voice classes that are non-singing but are like voice and speech...how to use your voice...which is crucial for all actors. My daughter, who is at NYU/Tisch, had to take two years of voice/speech (it was Linklater method). So, you will have to learn how to use your voice in terms of speech and diction and so forth, as an actor, if you do a BFA program anywhere (if it is a good one, there will be course requirements in voice/speech). I don't think any of these schools have "voice over" classes. I know you are interested in acting in film but from the body of your posts, you seem to think that you can do a program that just concentrates on film acting and I can only think of one that has that specific focus: Chapman. But even screen actors are trained as actors in theater programs. And part of acting training involves coursework in voice (not the singing kind of voice). Some also include some singing (which would be a DIFFERENT class than voice/speech).</p>