<p>The likely letter people have times than span across the 1 o'clock range.</p>
<p>As for the notion that CC has more overachievers, that is true, but there is simply no hard numbers to support the notion that something like half or three quarters of the people here would be accepted. A part of this perception comes from the fact that a large proportion of people who post in the decision threads are accepted - but that's because rejected people are much less likely to post their stats/decisions, because of, well, common sense. At the same time, there could also be a lot of 12 or 1 o'clockers who haven't posted.</p>
<p>That leaves the possibility of both 1 and 2 o-clockers being rejected (because it doesn't make sense to do it in the order of rejected-accepted-rejected instead of accepted-rejected-rejected), but as we've seen, all of people with LLs are 1 o'clockers, so this possibility is an impossibility.</p>
<p>I'm pretty sure the theories re. ordering by last name and location are refuted in previous posts.</p>
<p>That leaves the final possibility: is it ordered according to whether people used primary/alternate admissions?</p>
<p>Im a male from VA, applied CAS, 2:34PM, ALL stats <25%, spent 30 minutes on essays, bland ecs....Im probably as bad as they come</p>
<p>I guess I applied more as a joke, just so i could say i applied ivy</p>
<p>also i was waitlisted from UVA (instate too haha), so i have no hopes here</p>
<p>also, be careful with likely letter assumptions. I read that at least 4 people got Likely Letters from UVA and were then rejected. everyone was all shocked and ppl kept saying "i didnt know this could happen!"</p>
<p>Is there any substancial evidence as to why people are saying that the 2'o clock people are already the rejected group? People seem to be stating this as a fact and I would like to know why/</p>
<p>heres my reasoning. I SUCK and My time was 2:34 PM. Lemme share some stats with you</p>
<p>SAT1- 1270/1600, 1870/2400
SATII- USH 670, MathI-520
ACT-27
GPA- 3.5UW, 4.0W
only 2 Leadership spots
i spent 30 minutes on the essay
very bland EC's
low community service hours (50)
no research, published worked, national competitions
mediocre teacher recs
my guidence counselor is new so im sure her rec is bland
if they're holistic, i hvent showed any interest</p>
<p>berryb08 if u go back and read through the entirety of the thread you will see that many more people in the 2s commented that they wouldnt be likely to get in based on their stats... where the likelys are in the 1s and there are many very strong candidates in both the 1s and 12s... thats my reasoning but to be sure this is no definitive data</p>
<p>buuut although it really appears 2 is the rejection time, the 12s and 1s still confuses me. yes, there are 3 engineering likelys in the 1 slot (are there any others we know of?) but there are at least several pretty strong candidates i found in the 12s. could it be that 12/1 is split up differently than waitlist or admit? like arranged by school and whether they were a regular applicant, deferred applicant, likely letter candidate, rated level, etc?</p>