<p>The courses share very broadly similar concepts, but they certainly don't have to have the same outline or objectives, or even book list. Following are two different descriptions of Core 101 for next semester. Both of these courses are being offered, and both fulfill the same general Core 101 requirement. But they are very different:</p>
<p>CORE 101 SYMBOLS AND CONCEPTUAL SYSTEMS
Professor David Eggenschwiler, Department of English
Lecture-Discussion</p>
<p>This interdisciplinary course, which I tentatively call "The Unnatural Nature of Science and Literature," is odd
and about oddness. It is beyond, outside of, and often against familiar conceptual systems, thus being at odds
with its catalogue title. The "symbols" of the title will have to look after themselves. We shall read discussions of
the strangeness of science, read strange science, and read strange literature based on science and history. It will
be a complete liberal education in one bowl, with bread and cheese.
After introductory essays, we shall begin with a collection of essays by biologist Lewis Thomas, mainly on
seeing nature from a non-human-centered perspective. Then we'll juxtapose them with essays by biologist
Stephen Jay Gould, who for twenty years brought nature's oddities (especially as developed through evolution) to
the general public.
After some essays on the relation of science and the humanities, we shall relate the sciences and humanities,
first through case histories by Oliver Sacks (a Columbia professor of neurology, psychology, and writing) and then
through bizarre stories by Italo Calvino centered on characters living during the 13 billion years since (and
including) the Big Bang. A good time will be had by all.
We shall finish with three mythic, magical, and sometimes whimsical novels based on history: one on a mythic
Jewish town in Ukraine, one on an Indian reservation in South Dakota, and one on the origins and history of Islam
(along with a London race riot, love on the pampas of Argentina, the climbing of Mount Everest, and a
magical pilgrimage in India). More good time will be had by all.
The course will be conducted almost entirely by discussion (except when I talk for a while). You will be
required to be present, to have done the reading assignments, and to have prepared discussion topics for the
day. There will be four papers that will require you to explore topics variously without developing theses or coming
to conclusions. They will ask you to think and write differently, even differently than you were thinking and writing
in your previous paragraph or sentence. Unusual formats will be encouraged.
(Warning: You should choose another CORE 101 if you want a lot of coherence, tightly thematic direction, and
paper assignments that tell you pointedly what to do. I have found that many students like the freedom of
exploring the indefinite, but some are uncomfortable with messiness, and the course will be messy as will I.)
REQUIRED READING
Italo Calvino. Cosmicomics. San Diego: Harcourt Trade, 1976.
Louise Erdrich. Tracks. New York: HarperCollins, 1989.
Jonathan Safron Foer. Everything is Illuminated. New York: HarperCollins, 2008.
Stephen Jay Gould. The Flamingo’s Smile. New York: W. W. Norton, 1987.
Salman Rushdie. Satanic Verses. New York: Random House, 2008.
Oliver Sacks. An Antropologist on Mars. New York: Vintage, 1996.
Lewis Thomas. The Lives of a Cell. New York: Penguin, 1978.</p>
<p>FALL 2008
CORE 101 SYMBOLS AND CONCEPTUAL SYSTEMS
Professor John Bowlt, Department of Slavic Languages and Literature
Lecture</p>
<p>Modern Russian Art (Russian Art of the Late 19th and 20th Centuries)
The current vogue for Russian art is a clear indication that the subject of Russian art is no longer distant and
inaccessible, but has become an important part of the public domain. Current conditions (e.g., exhibition,
publication, and movie projects) point to an increasing, universal interest in the Russian visual arts and to a
reevaluation of them precisely within an international and comparative framework. What were the links between
Russian and German Romanticism? What did Realism mean for Russian, French, and American painters (and
writers) of the late 19th century? What happens to art when a socio-political transformation occurs of the
magnitude of the Bolshevik Revolution? How do we explain the parallels between Stalin's, Hitler's, and
Mussolini's Realisms? Is it fair to talk of a "new wave" in contemporary Russian art? How have </p>