<p>anyone remember the sentence for affable-craven?? what’s the context for affable and why is the word “complaisant” mentioned in that sentence?</p>
<p>tigerhobbes, the context was a guy is popular for his complaisance but his ___ manner was in fact a ___ affort to avoid conflict</p>
<p>oh, so it was not stopping the fights but avoiding conflict… all right thanks!</p>
<p>I put affable and craven. Craven means cowardly. I also think the species one is multiply.</p>
<p>I had put ablomb for the court sentence but then for some reason changed it to perfidy one minute before time was called. Ugh, note to self: follow your gut instinct</p>
<p>I got opacity, lucitious, and ablomb wrong from the list above. I’m also sure I missed a few on the passages. I hope I don’t get under 650 on each but section but it seems likely :(</p>
<p>What was the question for lucitious?</p>
<p>Ans yeah im dead sure it’s multiply because the animals are not just replenishing (maintaining) their numbers but increasing , that is, multiplying</p>
<p>Craven is the correct answer. I remember the last words are “to avoid conflict at all cost” => negative tone right?</p>
<p>Diverge is wrong: it would fit in the context in which animals spread out in different directions. This question is also on the beginning so it should be a familiar word like “multiply”.</p>
<p>Noxious is wrong too… I remember the context was “critics despised his pro-Stalin ballets and operas because they think those were politically ____”. I chose “tractable”, which means easily influenced or controlled".</p>
<p>@ Lucazz</p>
<p>noxious is very right. tractable mean ( easily not (influenced) but (control)) is positive why policitcally tractable is the source of criticism? noxious is right.</p>
<p>Should have followed my gut instinct on the opacity one…</p>
<p>missed out aplomb and fortitute… If only I found the november 2010 sat answer. Will the CR in november look like december 2010 experimental one?</p>
<p>I choose tractble on that question too …</p>
<p>Tractable is correct. Why would it be noxious? “politically harmful” would mean the flims(or whatever they are) are not pro-stalin but anti-stalin. “Politically controllable” makes perfect sense.</p>
<p>@yogurtrepublic can you run that by me again? i clearly remember viewers were contemptuous towards the director or something. why would it be tractable? noxious means harmful does it not ? it seemed more fitting to me …</p>
<p>i put noxious and multiply as well. I am not sure about craven actually, there was no but so it had to be commendable</p>
<p>@Hongkonggirl
Here…If we fit all the clues together, we know that</p>
<ol>
<li>The viewers were contemptuous, while the </li>
<li>Ballets and operas are pro-stalin(supporting Stalin, the political leader)</li>
</ol>
<p>Why? This means the viewers are unhappy about how the films are pro-stalin. They’re saying, “oh, these films are wayy too politically-influenced.” So they’re accusing the ballets and operas for being too pro-stalin, or politically tractable(controllable).</p>
<p>If you turn the tables around and put “noxious”, think: why would pro-stalin opera be politically harmful?</p>
<p>Anyone remember the answer annotate? Is it a q in the experimental section?</p>
<p>does anyone remember a question with options revere and reprove who quote went something like this - "the employees worked extra hours because they wanted to ______ the boss who got angry …</p>
<p>secondly, what were the quotes for the licentious and proprietary answers?</p>
<p>I think it should be “propitiate”. I chose this word confidently, but I can’t rmb its context.</p>