<p>the CR's were the media, indian programmer and dinosaur museum, right?</p>
<p>"Predictable..."? I'm terrible at CR though :</p>
<p>what was the answer to the attitudes towards the twain quote or was it the museum one? (answer choices something like problematic etc)</p>
<p>Was answer to the CR question about the Indian and the italicized each and every something to do with pervasiveness?</p>
<p>^ wat were the other choices for 'each and every"</p>
<p>and how would that be a persuasive 'phenomenon"? < i just dont get how what they were talking about could be a phenomenon</p>
<p>oh haha there were two like that,
let me elaborate.
It was the one that said what the curator Sally thought about the exhibit of the Trex and how the museum researchers didn't know its age.
The 2nd passage discussed the scientific community being honest and the public about its knowledge...
the choices were:
laudable but unnecessary???</p>
<p>trex: beneficial and something else</p>
<p>
[quote]
and I said passage two had a theory contradicting the first passage?
[/quote]
</p>
<p>I put this one too! Because the first one was afraid of animals, and the second one said there were no longer any animals to be afraid of... Seems like most people didn't put that one though.</p>
<p>For the Twain quote, I had explanation, but then on gut feel I put observation. I just felt like saying that they didn't admire the guy wasn't really an explanation, it was pretty obvious.</p>
<p>yea but 112358, there was no theory given in either passage...</p>
<p>
[quote]
yea but 112358, there was no theory given in either passage...
[/quote]
</p>
<p>True, but I don't see how insight works because the author was largely denying what passage 1 said. I guess you could go with cliche, but I don't think passage 1 was expressing a cliche any more than an insight.</p>
<p>You could say the cliche was the quote passage 1 gave, but the author of passage 2 wasn't really talking about the idea expressed in the quote so much as the overall idea of passage 1.</p>
<p>NEW QUESTION.</p>
<p>For the Indian programmer turned writer, what was the answer for the question where they asked for an analogy? I put an artist re-recording her single over and over again, but the runner one who eventually was satisfied with tying his best time could also work.</p>
<p>I don't think it was the runner tying his best run because in the passage it states he wanted to have unmatched quality or something like that, which doesn't fit with TYING the best run time (as opposed to beating it).</p>
<p>I put the artist redoing their songs.</p>
<p>^ I put the same one. The runner doesn't work because he improved his work instead of just making it equal to his previous efforts.</p>
<p>On the indian programmer one, there was a question about the ideas flowing from"his" own mind. Was this to transition to a new topic? or foreshadow something for later?</p>
<p>^I put transition.</p>
<p>^ I put elaborating, I think. It wasn't really a transition because he was already talking about how the characters were "his own."</p>
<p>I think I put elaborating.</p>
<p>I also put elaborating... he mentioned that writing was how he could create everything with his own mind and manipulate things the way he wanted.</p>
<p>For the lion I put insight because passage two didn't disagree with passage 1. It begins by saying they are dying out, but then it goes on to talk about how humans are humbled or something cause they are members of the world. Passage 1 briefly mentioned this when the kid said he thought about being prey. Also, was the difference that passage 1 had an anecdote?</p>