<p>yes, but it was ‘elaborating on a certain scenario’ or something like that… which wasn’t true.
i put transitioning.</p>
<p>Oh yea the chinese artist wasnt the experimental one, it was the one about the old lady, does anyone know which writing was experimental I had 2 25 minute ones? Haha I put euphorious or something like that, pragmatic… some other one, mal________ I got that correct, got other one wrong I put dimunitive crud I did bad on these sections!!! To bad the Indian computer programmer IS NOT the experimental whatsoever!!!</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>True, they agreed that humans can be prey (one of the other questions I think) but they disagreed about whether predators still existed… the one feared the lion and the other said all the predators had died out. I guess you could say they agreed on part and disagreed on part.</p>
<p>i think i put elaborating as well
because it was elaborating on the sentence before? I don’t think it really transitioned to anything?</p>
<p>does anyone remember the question better?</p>
<p>Yes, anecdote was correct.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I said hinted at a future claim, since it later went on to describe writing with his personal thoughts vs the readers interpretation. </p>
<p>elaboration made sense, and I originally had that, but it just doesn’t seem as purposeful and intentional as foreshadowing a claim</p>
<p>didn’t really see it as a transition. but i dunno</p>
<p>the quote was something along the lines of the characters all were developed from his mind, he created them</p>
<p>I was confused on the elaborating/transitioning, but I think I put transitioning as an impulse, because I couldn’t really justify either one. Also, what was the question in SC with superficial…compomising? I remember the choice but I can’t remember the question or what I put for it.</p>
<p>does anyone know if the chinese artist was experimental??</p>
<p>it was diligence isn’t superifical, its vital…etc, it is comprimised by people today</p>
<p>I didn’t think the Indian novelist passage was as bad as January’s “Rock and Roll” one. I actually understood this one, the Rock one…ugh I think I randomly guess on 4</p>
<p>Controversial questions:
Twain - observing/explaining
lions - cliche/insight/refuting</p>
<p>any others?</p>
<p>He was an Indian Programmer … I swore he was a writer? …
Anyways, it was a bewilderment on the changes. Yes?</p>
<p>he was a programmer turned writer.</p>
<p>Which question was that?</p>
<p>For the short story involving the lion, I said he expanded on the insight presented in passage 1. </p>
<p>Passage 1 talked about how the lion scared him, and how it reminded him that he was prey - this, I believe, was the insight. </p>
<p>Passage 2 talked about the importance of the lion to the Earth as a reminder that man isn’t dominant over everything, and puts man in his place, the “expansion on the insight”</p>
<p>There was no explanation because the explanation was implied from the passage. It was observation.</p>
<p>I put cliche I think I don’t remember the question just remmeber cliche</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>That was basically what made me change my answer. I really hope you’re right. I’m looking at 2-3 wrong (none confirmed wrong yet) so I’m on the fence as far as 800 is concerned…</p>
<p>The lion one was insight.</p>
<p>Take it from someone who got an 800 on CR in October. :)</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>But that’s the problem! They agreed in that, but at the same time they disagreed about whether predators were still present. So both answers have some viability.</p>
<p>For the Dinosaur one, I want to discuss a little.</p>
<p>1) She was bewildered by the changes. <– ?
2) She distrusted scientific community.</p>
<p>what was the one for the electronic technology passage?</p>
<p>dont remember the ?, it was like the general idea from the context…blah blah… , answers were:</p>
<p>children are lured into marketing strategies,
something about electronic/technology has a big influence?</p>