<p>yes, but it was 'elaborating on a certain scenario' or something like that.. which wasn't true.
i put transitioning.</p>
<p>Oh yea the chinese artist wasnt the experimental one, it was the one about the old lady, does anyone know which writing was experimental I had 2 25 minute ones? Haha I put euphorious or something like that, pragmatic... some other one, mal________ I got that correct, got other one wrong I put dimunitive crud I did bad on these sections!!! To bad the Indian computer programmer IS NOT the experimental whatsoever!!!</p>
<p>
[quote]
For the lion I put insight because passage two didn't disagree with passage 1. It begins by saying they are dying out, but then it goes on to talk about how humans are humbled or something cause they are members of the world.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>True, they agreed that humans can be prey (one of the other questions I think) but they disagreed about whether predators still existed... the one feared the lion and the other said all the predators had died out. I guess you could say they agreed on part and disagreed on part.</p>
<p>i think i put elaborating as well
because it was elaborating on the sentence before? I don't think it really transitioned to anything?</p>
<p>does anyone remember the question better?</p>
<p>Yes, anecdote was correct.</p>
<p>
[quote]
On the indian programmer one, there was a question about the ideas flowing from"his" own mind. Was this to transition to a new topic? or foreshadow something for later?
[/quote]
</p>
<p>I said hinted at a future claim, since it later went on to describe writing with his personal thoughts vs the readers interpretation. </p>
<p>elaboration made sense, and I originally had that, but it just doesn't seem as purposeful and intentional as foreshadowing a claim</p>
<p>didn't really see it as a transition. but i dunno</p>
<p>the quote was something along the lines of the characters all were developed from his mind, he created them</p>
<p>I was confused on the elaborating/transitioning, but I think I put transitioning as an impulse, because I couldn't really justify either one. Also, what was the question in SC with superficial...compomising? I remember the choice but I can't remember the question or what I put for it.</p>
<p>does anyone know if the chinese artist was experimental??</p>
<p>it was diligence isn't superifical, its vital...etc, it is comprimised by people today</p>
<p>I didn't think the Indian novelist passage was as bad as January's "Rock and Roll" one. I actually understood this one, the Rock one...ugh I think I randomly guess on 4</p>
<p>Controversial questions:
Twain - observing/explaining
lions - cliche/insight/refuting</p>
<p>any others?</p>
<p>He was an Indian Programmer .. I swore he was a writer? ..
Anyways, it was a bewilderment on the changes. Yes?</p>
<p>he was a programmer turned writer.</p>
<p>Which question was that?</p>
<p>For the short story involving the lion, I said he expanded on the insight presented in passage 1. </p>
<p>Passage 1 talked about how the lion scared him, and how it reminded him that he was prey - this, I believe, was the insight. </p>
<p>Passage 2 talked about the importance of the lion to the Earth as a reminder that man isn't dominant over everything, and puts man in his place, the "expansion on the insight"</p>
<p>There was no explanation because the explanation was implied from the passage. It was observation.</p>
<p>I put cliche I think I don't remember the question just remmeber cliche</p>
<p>
[quote]
There was no explanation because the explanation was implied from the passage. It was observation.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>That was basically what made me change my answer. I really hope you're right. I'm looking at 2-3 wrong (none confirmed wrong yet) so I'm on the fence as far as 800 is concerned...</p>
<p>The lion one was insight.</p>
<p>Take it from someone who got an 800 on CR in October. :)</p>
<p>
[quote]
For the short story involving the lion, I said he expanded on the insight presented in passage 1. </p>
<p>Passage 1 talked about how the lion scared him, and how it reminded him that he was prey - this, I believe, was the insight. </p>
<p>Passage 2 talked about the importance of the lion to the Earth as a reminder that man isn't dominant over everything, and puts man in his place, the "expansion on the insight"
[/quote]
</p>
<p>But that's the problem! They agreed in that, but at the same time they disagreed about whether predators were still present. So both answers have some viability.</p>
<p>For the Dinosaur one, I want to discuss a little.</p>
<p>1) She was bewildered by the changes. <-- ?
2) She distrusted scientific community.</p>
<p>what was the one for the electronic technology passage?</p>
<p>dont remember the ?, it was like the general idea from the context...blah blah... , answers were:</p>
<p>children are lured into marketing strategies,
something about electronic/technology has a big influence?</p>