I’ve been using the pr book and I wonder how accurate are the practice tests, some posts say that it is on point while others say that it is a bit harder than the real one. Could someone that have any experience with pr books for the sat physics tell me what do you think ?
I found them to be very similar to the real thing in terms of difficulty.
@unready thank you. Do you know anything about kaplan ? I read it was easier, but I also read about someone scoring 700-750 and 780 on the real thing.
A lot of the accuracy between review book tests and the actual test depends on how closely your approach to taking practice tests matches your approach to the real test. If that makes any sense.
@josevi I don’t, sorry. But this thread (http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/sat-subject-tests-preparation/1143919-what-sat-physics-and-math-level-2-books-should-i-get-sat-subject-test-book-reviews.html) says about Kaplan “The tests are slightly easier than the real thing, but the explanations are easier to understand than the ones in PR. Buy this if you need to go over the content contained in the test and would benefit from better explanations.”