<p>As someone who is actually on track to finish in 3 years(with a standard 15-credit per semester schedule), I’m going to tell you right now that if you attempt this, you are going to crash and burn. I don’t say this as I general rule, I say this about you specifically. Don’t take anything I say personally; if I’m blunt, that’s because sugar-coating the truth does you no favors.</p>
<p>Before I explain why I don’t think you’ll make it, I’ll start with your reasons.
Tuition. I do understand how this may be important, especially since you want a Masters. But getting your tuition paid for is simply a matter of finding scholarships and balancing your budget in a very responsible way. You can also find work to help pay for the costs. I currently make $4k/year in excess of my tuition/fees in scholarship money alone. If you’re actually a good student, the money is around. You just have to look for it and spend responsibly.
You’re not going to be better off in a Masters program if you rush your undergrad. Masters courses are nothing like high school or an undergrad. They are all about your major and require an in-depth knowledge of all the prerequisites. If you rush your undergrad, you will either flunk out of your Masters program or get close enough to it that your degree becomes meaningless (who wants to take someone for an extremely complex job that requires an advanced degree if they’re not competent enough to keep up with work like that?).
Opening your summers is your last reason. Summers are important, but you’re forgetting that so are school years. You should find a good lab and get started when you can. Don’t bother taking more classes than a standard workload; just take the four years.</p>
<p>Now, I’ll get to why I don’t think you can do it.</p>
<p>Graduating in three years in engineering is the hardest of all potential early graduations. For one, it’s impossible to do in any less than three years. The workload is also much greater. I know plenty of talented people who graduated with highest honors in three years from science programs, and they agree that the workload there is nothing in comparison. To graduate early, you really do have to be one of the best students the university has ever seen from the very start.</p>
<p>Everyone in here who talks about adjusting to college life makes an extremely valid point. High school and college are nothing alike, and if you’re going for 3 years, you really have to be worlds ahead of your fellow incoming freshmen in maturity. Given that you’re clueless about the workload in a university, I can already tell that this is not you. Most are. But most don’t finish in 3 years either.</p>
<p>Also, your freshmen year will feature the weed-out classes, usually the calculus series (3 classes, last one in your soph year) and physics for majors (2 classes). If you’re curious what these are, they’re generally core classes required by your major that demand significantly more of you than they honestly need to do to master the material in order to get rid of those that aren’t capable or committed to rising to the challenge. Really, it’s a form of mercy killing; they tell you nicely in your first year that you’re not cut out to be an engineer before classes like Physical Chemistry, Differential Equations tell you what’s up. Or worse, if your university coddles you through it, the most painful and costly lesson you could learn would be from the real world. Before these more difficult challenges murder you ten times over, the university gives you a simple chance to get out if you’re not really up to it and you’re just fooling yourself.
What does this mean? It means that right from the start, you’re going to be saddled with hours and hours of work. More, you really should play the game the university expects you to play because unless you really, truly know better (YOU don’t), you should trust the academic expertise of those that made the curriculum. They have graduate degrees and decades of experience; you don’t. AP, IB, and even community college classes are no indication of how you’ll do in university; many AP/IBs end up as C students because they fail to adjust properly.</p>
<p>3 years requires an immense work ethic and also a lot of natural talent, especially in math. You have to be on top of your work and pretty much do it as it is assigned, even if that’s 2+ weeks in advance. You also have to be really, really on top of math work. You have to understand derivatives, integrals, sigma notation, and even Taylor series of a formula and what is means in more simple terms in a matter of seconds. The thing about three years is that you can never afford to fall behind, even for a moment; not just in your classes, but also in everything else as well. When you get to differential equations (a very, very difficult math class to do exceptionally well in), for example, your resolve will be tested, and it’s extremely easy to falter. You will falter sooner or later, I assure you. There’s plenty of help for you, so don’t really worry. It’s just that 3 years is not possible if this is the case.
Even if you are talented, there is a lot of work that’s a grind. Genius or not, 30+ complex problem sets a week take a long time. It gets hard sometimes, and your work ethic also cannot falter even for a moment, no matter how BS the situation may get.</p>
<p>Transfer credits. If you don’t have over a year’s worth of credits for your major, you’re not graduating early no matter how good you are. Sorry, but it’s just simply not happening. </p>
<p>So to summarize, if you’re not one of the most talented, hard-working, prepared, and mature students the university has ever seen, don’t even bother trying to finish engineering in 3. I can already see that you aren’t. Go for four. You don’t know better than the university that tells you that you need to spend four years on it.</p>