<p><a href=“Also%20worth%20considering,%20DD%20likely%20takes%20a%20large%20chunk%20out%20of%20the%20money%20students%20would%20be%20using%20on%20off-campus%20dining”>I</a> *</p>
<p>that is a necessary situation which many/most colleges have to agree to otherwise these vendors would not put their dining venues on campus property. Those businesses don’t get year round daily business as they would if they were off-campus. They often have little or no business at night or on weekends or during the summer. They wouldn’t bother if they weren’t given some assurance that students would use their restaurants. </p>
<p>Schools need them on campus because they can’t provide enough food choice variations themselves. </p>
<p>And, no student must use their DD…they could cash them out at the end of the year and use them wherever they want the next year. the only year affected would be frosh year. And, after frosh year, no student has to buy a meal plan anyway. </p>
<p>*Yeah, Crimson cafe sucked, no doubt about it, but I find it rather problematic that Aramark is allowed to levy a 20% fee on all Dining Dollars transactions, making competitors, well, unable to compete, *</p>
<p>Since Aramark can’t force a restaurant to accept DD, there isn’t an issue with “allowing”. Aramark is a private company. If Bama objected, all Aramark would do is say that no outside restaurants can accept DD. Then what? That’s what most restaurants are already doing since so few accept DD.</p>
<p>An outside restaurant accepts DD to bring in business…that’s the only reason. They aren’t obligated to participate. </p>
<p>If the Crimson Cafe was offering a great product is would have strong sales like OTHER restaurants do in T-town that don’t accept DD.</p>
<p>**The fact that CC is hurting despite the fact that T-town has been CROWDED with extra people/workers/etc after the Tornadoes is an indictment of its quality …and nothing else. **</p>