<p>The question is:
In comparison to Passage 2, the tone of Passage 1 is more
(A) earnest
(B) inspirational
(C) complacent
(D) defensive
(E) sarcastic</p>
<p>Passage 1 mocks the “experts” and also its own subject (writing) by using long sentences and uncommon words to explain that good writing should do the opposite. The language is especially sarcastic when the author portrays the “experts’” treatment of writing as a science that has “perennial and fundamental laws” that can be calculated “apparently with the mathematical precision of astronomers.” The tone of Passage 2 is concerned, not sarcastic. Passage 2 speaks of the responsibility of writers to raise the reading level of their audience.</p>
<p>I met this question last week.
Hope the explanation will be useful :)</p>