<p>Hey guys! Here is another post with a bunch of critical reading question that I had questions on.</p>
<p>(lines designated in the question will be italicized with the rest as context)</p>
<ol>
<li>It has been suggested that the detailed listings of animals, plants, and minerals by their usefulness to humans indicate the _________ of the ancient Mesopotamians.</li>
</ol>
<p>a) irrationality
b) humanity
c) temerity
d) serendipity
e) anthropocentrism</p>
<p>Can anyone please explain the right answer (e) for me? I looked up the definition of the answer and it still doesnt make sense.</p>
<ol>
<li>In the fourth paragraph (lines 37-48), the authors most important point is that animals in the wild</li>
</ol>
<p>a) perceive landscapes differently than do animals in captivity
b) have modes of communicating that are very similar to those of humans
c) are likely to live longer than animals kept in zoos
d) depend on the care and support of others of their species
e) may have highly developed sensibilities about which scientists know little</p>
<p>
[quote]
In the wild, animals exist in a world of which we have little understanding. They may communicate with their kind through languages that are indecipherable by humans. A few studies suggest that some species perceive landscapes much differently than people do; for example, they may be keenly attuned to movement on the faces of mountains or across the broad span of grassy plains. Also, their social structures may be complex and integral to their well-being. Some scientists believe they may even develop cultural traditions that are key to the survival of the populations.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Can anyone explain why the answer is E and why the other answers are wrong?</p>
<ol>
<li>The author quotes Bredius opinion (lines 36-43) in order to show that</li>
</ol>
<p>a) unknown paintings by many famous artists are waiting to be found
b) an artworks history affects how people judge it
c) the totality of a work is what makes it valuable
d) no one has found the actual Christ at Emmaus
e) any artists work can be easily forged</p>
<p>
[quote]
In 1937 In 1937 the art historian Abraham Bredius wrote of a painting entitled Christ at Emmaus, which he believed to be the work of the great seventeenth-century Dutch artist Vermeer, but which was in fact a forgery by a Dutch painter names Hans van Meegeren:
*
It is a wonderful moment in the life of a lover art when he finds himself suddenly confronted with a hiterhto unknown painting by a great master,
on the original canvas, and without any restoration, just as it left the painters studio! And what a picture!... What we have here is a I am inclined to saythe masterpiece of Jan Vermeer of Delft.
*
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Answer is B. Anyone want to explain that and why the other answers are wrong?</p>
<p>Thanks in advance!</p>