<p>The title pretty much explains it all. I was rejected by UCLA, but I really want to go to Berk. Reply and make me feel better! :)</p>
<ul>
<li>Whoops, I guess there is already a thread about this. My bad!</li>
</ul>
<p>Good luck!</p>
<p>when do you hear back from berk anyway?? is it march 30th for everyone?</p>
<p>My cousin was...rejected from LA and is a current Berk student.</p>
<p>Add me to the tally.</p>
<p>i was rejected from ucla and go to cal</p>
<p>I know someone who didn't get into UCLA but got into Berkeley.</p>
<p>If any of you guys that got into Cal but not UCLA wouldn't mind sharing your stats that would be great...</p>
<p>I know two people who were rejected from UCLA, but got into UChicago (they were both instate cali kids). Go figure :confused:</p>
<p>UC GPA 4.17
SAT I: 1390
SAT II: 700 Math 2c, 720 Writing, 760 US
APs: Two 3's, One 4, Three 5's
EC's: President and Founder of GSA, Three years of journalism, teen columnist for large eastbay newspaper, recipiant of Human Rights Campaign Youth Award (2002). congressional intern</p>
<p>I attended a seminar with a Berkeley admissions officer a month or so ago and she explained that the cross-admit rate between the two schools is hard to predict. This is basically because Berkeley and UCLA have two different admissions procedures and focus on different aspects. She went further into the differences between the two systems, but really there is no way to fully predict the outcomes based off one or the other's admissions. </p>
<p>However, I will say that she mentioned that UCLA is much more SAT focused (she bases this claim on her examination of the admit data released from the school), than Berkeley is. </p>
<p>Good luck come March 30th!</p>
<p>My friend was rejected by UCLA but admitted to Berkeley in the class of '08. He had around a 4.5 total gpa (He got a 4.67 both semesters Junior year) and 1340 SATs. I don't really know how he pulled that off because he is a tremendous slacker, but he did.</p>
<p>I was rejected from UCLA (IN ENGINEERING!!!) but got into CAL.....UCLA doesn't make any sense!!</p>
<p>I thought it was the other way around, where Berkeley puts more weight on Sats and UCLA on GPA. Anyway i got accepted to UCLA, but im really hoping on berkeley because its my top pick. Do you think more people get accepted to berkeley and rejected at UCLA, or more accepted UCLA and rejected at Berkeley.</p>
<p>Stop! ! !</p>
<p>really, we're all just going in circles. Why don't we just wait until admissions come out?</p>
<p>I just got my rejection letter from UCLA. 47000 applicants and 4625 admitted. That's less than 10%. Is that normal?</p>
<p>That is incorrect. 4625 is the expected size of the incoming class, NOT the number of students admitted.</p>
<p>my guess is UCLA is weights the SAT more heavily than Cal. I get the feeling that the admissions department at LA is just a computer that reads numbers and spits out decesions.</p>