<p>Adkdad: WayOutWestMom hit a lot of the main points concerning the courses you inquired about. I’ll add a little more information on my part:</p>
<p>Generally, the experience is highly dependent on the professor. Having said that, there is no real way to utilize this information and apply it, as there is only one professor teaching a specific class per semester. Pre-major classes NEED to be done at a certain point during undergrad to allow for upper-level coursework.</p>
<p>Forgive my pessimistic tone ahead of time :
BIO 110/111: Garbage. 110 is taught by Olek, and I think I was like the only one out of 650 students who liked him. I thought his teaching goals were interesting (he wants us to critically analyze the scientific literature; not focus on memorization but overarching concepts, etc.) but VERY poorly implemented. I was able to ace his class, but only because I was a sophomore and knew what to expect. My only advice is to study day-by-day, and don’t cram! Going to lecture is useless, but pick your workshop TA’s brain to succeed!</p>
<p>111: Usually taught by Minckley, who is indifferent towards students. I wasn’t required to take this class so I haven’t. The story with Minckley is he’s an adjunct, and only has this job because the Biology department wanted his wife for her research. Well, the woman left the department and we are left with this guy. The guy is a little nuts, but the biggest problem I hear from my friends is that his exams are not representative at all of the important concepts in lecture. Be prepared to memorize heaps of useless information if you want to avoid surprises on exam day! Thorough studying is needed to beat the curve.</p>
<p>112/113: I don’t know too much about them so follow WayOutWestMom’s advice. One thing I do know is try to avoid Platt for 112. He runs the class like straight-up Biochemistry (he recommends you buy a Biochemistry book). Nobody I know did well in this class (except WayOutWestMom’s daughter maybe). 113 is a mystery to me.</p>
<p>MTH 141/142 vs. 161/162 vs. 170q series:</p>
<p>Here’s my recommendation: If a student only needs to complete two calculus classes for their major (or just pre-med; Biology (B.A) or unrelated major) then take MTH 141 and MTH 142!!! I don’t care how smart you think you are, everybody is here, and why should you make it harder on yourself than you need to?</p>
<p>It’s tough to know how well the class will be taught, because calculus instructors are Visiting Assistant Professors who are recycled like plastic bottles. There ARE multiple sections though, so once you can get access to course evaluations with your netID, go into the database and do your research! Going to a 9 AM section with a good professor is better than a 1230 section with a lousy one.</p>
<p>I regularly tutor MTH 161. I would say the level of instruction is slightly higher, and a little more fast-paced than Calculus AB (the 140 series is probably more on-point with the pace of AP Calc). Definitely doable, and with the right professor, can actually be enjoyable!</p>
<p>162 is usually pretty miserable.</p>
<p>The MTH 170 series is an entirely different beast. Well taught, but very rigorous theoretical proof based. Only take these if you have a serious interest in Mathematics.</p>
<p>Developmental Psychology:
There are many great opportunities available, murrowmom. If your daughter matriculates, implore her to send her resume to every lab she is interested in ASAP. Keep trying, and don’t give up if there’s no e-mail response. A lot of getting into a lab is luck (trust me). I know a couple people that were involved in an Autism lab (Prof. Bennetto), and loved the hell out of it. Also, there’s a developmental side to the lab that WayOutWestMom introduced – developmental cognitive neuroscience; this field is pretty interesting! As a general rule, if you want research, U of R has it!</p>