<p>
</p>
<p>Yes, you’re correct. Condescending is a better description. (Although in this case he was also pretentious, but perhaps for other reasons. )</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Yes, you’re correct. Condescending is a better description. (Although in this case he was also pretentious, but perhaps for other reasons. )</p>
<p>Can you please use our user names in the research paper, as well? I hope you use the quote from Xanatos- classy, yet succinct.</p>
<p>I would appreciate it if you didn’t use my name or anything I’ve written in any papers. And I don’t know about anyone else on this thread, but I don’t appreciate being studied like a zoo animal. Next time, inform people that their responses could be recorded somewhere.</p>
<p>No, I didn’t quote anything anyone said. I just used generalizations. Btw, I got an A. Wooot!</p>