December 2008 Score Predictions

<p>I'd say...</p>

<p>Chem: 700
Physics: 720</p>

<p>Being a bit safe, but it could definitely go in ether direction, so... maybe I'm not. Lol.</p>

<p>Annnd post in here when you get your results to compare them to your predictions! :)</p>

<p>Math 2: 650-700 (I make a lot of really dumb mistakes)
Chem: ? (it did not go well...) 600? Maybe?</p>

<p>Lit: 700+ probably. I felt pretty confident
U.S History: 650-700
Chem: lol, can I get a negative score? Probably like 400 or something. Why did I take this test, again?</p>

<p>Chem : 750?
Math : 770 ): omit 6</p>

<p>Math 2: 780 im sad</p>

<p>^ you make me feel like crap :(</p>

<p>bio-700
french-720
spanish-800</p>

<p>Physics - 740 . Hopefully 800. :)</p>

<p>phys 760 give or take 40?</p>

<p>How many can we get wrong in Math Level 2 and still get an 800?</p>

<p>around 5, i think.</p>

<p>Bio: 740
Math: 780 im sadddddd</p>

<p>^Since the Math Level 2 curve seems to be easier than the other SAT II's, do colleges look at 780's/770's/etc. as if they were lower?</p>

<p>bio:660
math2:620</p>

<p>math 2: 800
chem: 800</p>

<p>Math 2: 650.</p>

<p>physics: 700+
math 2: 650+.....stupid mistakes galore</p>

<p>Math 2: 780 (eff. I needed that 800)</p>

<p>WH: 700 (even with the generous curve, it raped me. Hard.)</p>

<p>In regards to Empress' question, yes, IMO.</p>

<p>Obviously, I'm not an adcomm, but 10% of test-takers make an 800 in Math 2. That is a huge number for perfect scores. In Literature, by contrast, an 800 is in the 99+ percentile, making it more elusive.</p>

<p>So, in summation, that's why I'll be pi$$ed about a 780....because it's really like a 700 to HYPS adcomms haha</p>

<p>math 1: around 700....not really happy about this</p>