December 2010 Sat CR (Journalists)

<p>Compilation:</p>

<p>SCs

  1. Prolific - writer
  2. Ingenious - clever and almost
  3. Fluctuation (star)
  4. Ubiquitous (not soporific)
  5. Eclipsed
  6. Disputable
  7. Foster - Braque helped Picasso foster Cubism
  8. Rancorous
  9. Enigmatic - Konigsburg novel
  10. Satire - topsy turvey world
  11. Nostalgic - for past and ambitious future
  12. Merited … Prescient</p>

<p>Seva the Indian-America writer

  1. Physical memory - mountains etc)
  2. Cold - impersonal
  3. Divorce papers are accusing
  4. Wise people who gave advice are more accustomed to Manhattan
  5. Her section was Conspicuous
  6. Boss was skeptical and then satisfied
  7. The advise she would give - many Indians have kept relationships while in different countries</p>

<p>That was another choice that wasn’t true gohackers, since neither mentioned the benefits to administrators’ point of view.</p>

<p>Compilation Continued:</p>

<p>Architecture:

  1. The writer and prince both viewed modernistic architecture as tasteless
  2. The writer included the reader for the first time in Paragraph 2
  3. In paragraph 3 he never gave a solution to the problem of ugly office buildings
  4. Modernistic buildings would look better in an electronics area
  5. Modernism moved from egalitarianism to snobbish
  6. Companies create TV shows to appear cultured
  7. Liberal = plentiful</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Even though I don’t think that “define the term” is the right answer, I don’t think that downplay is correct either.</p>

<p>I put morally flexible too… I was torn between that and broad minded D:</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Other way around. :)</p>

<p>314169265: What question are you guys talking about?</p>

<p>@youwrotethis - Neither of those were correct, so it wasn’t much of a loss</p>

<p>“Even though I don’t think that “define the term” is the right answer, I don’t think that downplay is correct either.”</p>

<p><800 314159265?</p>

<p>314159265 what did you put
it wasn’t define term , not downplay i think it was def not d or e, i crossed those out</p>

<p>just for clarity it was refute … disputable and the other pair was identify … manifest</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Umm, depends on the curve. This is the only iffy one I have left (that I can remember). CR isn’t my strength, anyway, so 750+ will make me a very happy kid on 12/21.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>I remember putting C and then switching it to A at the very end. So I might not have put define term; unless somebody posts all 5 choices, I really don’t remember. Oh well, it’s not like this is a math question with the ridiculous math curve.</p>

<p>w8 mike how can it be downplay? author 2 supported the college students</p>

<p>at pinkumbrella. I think it was “reluctantly concedeing” something</p>

<p>go hackers: the first pair is right the second isn’t. identify was another pair</p>

<p>If you guys are talking about that one question where it said what did passage one do that passage two didn’t, I put define a term. They didn’t define it explicitly in the second passage, they just went on as if we knew what it meant. And really? If it wasn’t morally flexible or broad minded, what was it?</p>

<p>ohhhh, now i remember that question. I put define a term because they both explicitly defined the restriction in some way</p>

<p>ok i THINK i didn’t pick reluctantly conceding, downplay or define term
sooo lol
the other 2 answers?</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>I put define term as well. Though the question was asking for something Passage 2 did but not Passage 1.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>I could have sworn that it was asking for something 2 did but not 1.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>If this was the “liberal” question, it meant plentiful.</p>

<p>it was plentiful.
did we confirm that it was “development”
it went seomthing like
“the discovery of our ignorance should not be conecieved as a negative thing”
and another use of the word “thing” in the same passage. the question asked what this “thing” reffered to as. none of the other choices made sense so I went with “development”</p>