<p>and also does anyone remember what the exact wording was for the “lost its identity” answer was? because i feel like there was a lot more too it, which would change the meaning of the answer</p>
<p>What were the five answer choices exactly for that one?</p>
<p>Compiled
SCs
- Prolific - writer
- Ingenious - clever and almost Check
- Fluctuation (star) Check
- Ubiquitous (not soporific) ----- Did we ever confirm this? what were the other choices I was 100% sure about the SC section and I don’t remember putting Ubiquitous as an answer to a question.</p>
<p>I think it went like this:The investigators ______ the charges about the illegal toxic waste dump though the information used to make this determination was _____ to both sides to support their side.
5. Refute/Disputable or disregard/manifest Check (Refute/disputable)
other answer choices are “identify … vague” and “substantiate…authoritative”</p>
<ol>
<li>Foster - Braque helped Picasso foster Cubism Check</li>
<li>Rancorous Check</li>
<li>Enigmatic - Konigsburg novel, arcane Check</li>
<li>Satire - topsy turvey world Check</li>
<li>Nostalgic - for past and ambitious future Check</li>
<li>Prescient … Merited Check
12.popular president Check
13.prodigious sources Check
14.prominent…something Check</li>
</ol>
<p>Short passage:
College paired
15. What is same about both passage? Campus policy caused (the wording was “led to”) the discontent of some students. ----Check
16.Protest on campus “too convient” = only served the interests of college admin Check
17.How would the student in passage one react to California university’s policy? Disapproval. Check
18.Reluctant to concede, Downplay? Define the term? — Advocate a point seems to be the most strongly argued answer choice Check</p>
<p>Long passages:
Seva the Indian-America writer
19. Physical memory - mountains etc) Check
20. Cold - impersonal Check
21. Divorce papers are accusing (uneasiness and guilt, personification) Check
22. Wise people who gave advice are more accustomed to Manhattan Check
23. Her section was Conspicuous Check
24. Boss was skeptical and then satisfied Check
25. The advise she would give - many Indians have kept relationships while in different countries(reassuring) Check
26.Regarding the common problems: list of examples Check</p>
<p>Scince (ignorance one)
27. the greatest discovery - our ignorance -> counter-intutitve Checked
28 .question about line 4 to line… following “it is a story of change”. — Put it in a broader context VS the consequences of a trend
29. question about snowflake. infinite Multitude. Check
30. what the thing referred to -> development Checked.
31. the quality of a Milky way citizen -> Intelecutally adventurous Checked
32. the last question -> Eager hopefulness to fill the vessege of our ignorance Checked</p>
<p>Architecture:
33. The writer and prince both viewed modernistic architecture as tasteless (they both were offended by it, lapses) Check
34. The writer included the reader for the first time in Paragraph 2 (the exact wording “explicitly identified with the reader” Check
35. Liberal = plentiful (other choices, broader minded, morally flexible) Check
36. In paragraph 3 he never gave a solution to the problem of ugly office buildings (“didn’t provide the alternative”) Check
37. question about “defensless”. how people could do nothing seeing their environment changes? – Needs to be confirmed
38. Modernistic buildings would look better in an electronics area (“electronic plant”) Check
39. Contradiction: Modern building Vs. rural setting. Check
40. Modernism moved from egalitarianism to snobbish? (I didn’t put this one but seemed to be the consensus) Check
41. Companies create TV shows to appear cultured (cultured image) ("sponsored a British educatonal program to appear cultured) Check
42. victim of itself: Modernism lost the favor of the people or it lost its original identity? –needs to be confirmed</p>
<p>Journalist
43. so New and Big Media was like objectionable Check
44. parity somewhere Check
45. Reason for real phenomenon, what are the other choices to this? Don’t remember I have this question.-- needs to be confirmed
46. difference between the two journalism passages- passage 1 was positive while passage 2 was negative ( the answer was more like passage two takes a new perspective) Check
47.What was similar between the two journalism passages regarding public involvement? public involvement was becoming commonplace Check
48.covered for journalism - write about (report on) Check
49. journalism author 2 use diff view point？？ (What are other answer choices? don’t remember I have this question either.)---- needs to be confirmed
50.Author of passage one is more…? Optimistic? Check
51.line…to line… in passage two do what? show flaws in their basic assumptions? But I think it is not about flaws of assumptions in author one ’s argumentation. Check
52.How author of passage two would react to first lines about how everyone could become journalist in passage one? I pick one about understatement. (journalism requires sophistication only few possesse) Or overstatement? (that it takes more than just a communications tool kit) – needs to be confirmed
53. the both passages discussed the potential impacts of the New Age Media Check</p>
<p>is there any reason that “criticized for its preeminence” does not work in this situation?</p>
<p>The “lost its identity” choice went something like “modern architecture lost its identity and therefore is being debased”. I know for sure the word debase was there.</p>
<p>Anyone remember the question or other choices for this one:</p>
<p>Seva
20. Cold - impersonal </p>
<p>I feel like I put impersonal, but I want to make sure.</p>
<p>at ready4college90. it wasn’t exactly the preeminence of modern architecture that the author thought was wrong. it was more of how it changed after it became so popular. like that one question we confirmed, modern architecture shifted from egalitarian to snobbish. hence lost its first identity.</p>
<p>At annonymousFTW. unresponsive, stale, and I’m not too sure about the other two.</p>
<p>I apologize. You’re right. He ruled out classical architecture as an alternative.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I remember the context of the question. Cold was describing New York City, more specifically I think it was concrete and maybe the buildings.</p>
<p>I’m blanking on the other answer choices, but I remember it was really easy to eliminate three of them and the final two were somewhat similar. With impersonal being the correct answer.</p>
<p>Does anyone remember the answer to the one about the author where the author wouldn’t want buildings? It was a NOT/except question.</p>
<p>a) Rural University
b) Factory in an industrialized area
c) Art gallery? in a historic part of town
d)
e)</p>
<p>I forgot the other two answer choices.</p>
<p>One of the choices was nonresponsive for that one. That’s what I put because I took cold to mean devoid of life or something along those lines.</p>
<p>Btw, does anyone remember the question with imperiousness as one of the choices? I think it was in the journalism passage.</p>
<p>What was rancorus? I swear I asked yesterday but I can’t find the post… I’m worried I got it wrong cause I don’t remember it D:</p>
<p>@Avid, I remember now. Yea I think it was mentioning the buildings and sort of comparing to plants? Ok nice. </p>
<p>And that question was asking which one would the author approve of. The only one is the electrical powerplant (factory) in an industrialized area.</p>
<p>@youwortethis, it was something about deep hatred of some girl. deep hatred -> rankrous. that’s like a slam dunk question if u know what rankorous means.</p>
<p>I don’t remember it at all… maybe I got it wrong idk D: If it was a hard question I think I would remember it… :/</p>
<p>Anyone remember the other choices to the ubiquitous question? and how the sentence was structured?</p>
<p>The sentence was about advertisements and how they were everywhere aka ubiquitous.</p>
<p>I think one was inclusive. I saw these two and stupidly chose inclusive.</p>
<p>For line to line question on the journalist passage…
The compiled answer shows that the right answer is “to show flaws in their basic assumptions”…
I put something like … To indiate the negative consequences that would follow will not be as easy to solve…
Another choice was To warn something… in mocking tone…
Can any of you explains this question?
thx</p>