<p>Ubiquitous is right; inclusive is not.</p>
<p>Liberal=plentiful, since the American architect used lots of historical references.</p>
<p>morally flexible really doesn’t make sense. I’m almost 100% sure that liberal=plentiful in this case (plentiful (a lot of) historical references would make the prince happy, not morally flexible historical references)</p>
<p>yeah i put prodigious for that one</p>
<p>yeah that’s what i put. b/c the person he was referring to used a lot of historical references or something like that</p>
<p>it’s okay guys 
if we all did pretty bad on the architecture, then the curve will be better :).</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Why? That was the answer I originally put, but I decided to change because I couldn’t find a reason for her guilt. All it mentioned was that the papers were staring accusingly at her, so I said that it portrayed the harshness of a new life in America. The link to the text is [url=<a href=“Darjeeling: A Novel - Bharti Kirchner - Google Books”>Darjeeling: A Novel - Bharti Kirchner - Google Books]here[/url</a>].</p>
<p>So, I still can’t help but think that the modern architecture CR was experimental…There were questions on their that were not traditional SAT questions, and the passage itself was overblown with sentences packed with information. I just got this weird vibe when taking it. Not to mention that it was far more difficult than any passage I have ever encountered.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>…</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Accusingly -> indicating a belief in someone’s guilt or culpability</p>
<p>Despite the fact that the ‘modern architecture’ seems not to be experimental because people had that passage who also had math experimentals, it still convincingly seems like the experimental section due to the fact that it had types of questions that were not traditional SAT questions, such as “the author failed to…because”.</p>
<p>Can anyone shed some light on this?</p>
<p>I don’t think there’s any possibility that it’s an experimental, sorry (or good, if you did well on it!) – I had a writing experimental and had the architecture section.</p>
<p>The modern architecture passage did have a different feel to it, but I don’t think it’s for the reason(s) you are stating. One thing that was really important about the modern architecture passage was really understanding the author’s point of view. I think his point of view was that modern architecture is abhorred and was only supposed to be used for utilitarian purposes. He’s astonished this “burgeoning” trend has lasted so long. He blames big business, the CEOs, who tell the adept architects what to do. (Architects are not to blame).</p>
<p>I would say some of the questions put a lot more emphasis on your ability to be in the author’s shoes than passage analysis. </p>
<p>The passage did feel a bit odd since it was like the culmination of all inference questions of an entire SAT placed into one section.</p>
<p>Anyone know what the other answer choices were for the egalitarian…snobbish question?</p>
<p>And is refuted/disputed all but confirmed? There still seems to be an air of uncertainty surrounding that question.</p>
<p>And can we clear up the last few journalism questions? I can’t remember what the question was based on the current description in the compiled answers, but I need to figure out since it’ll determine whether I cancel my scores.</p>
<p>The Prince of Wales: Right Or Wrong? : an Architect Replies to the Prince of Wales
by Maxwell Hutchinson
Share |</p>
<p>The Prince of Wales warned the architectural profession that he wanted to “stir things up, to throw a proverbial Royal brick through the inviting plate glass of pompous professional pride”. His views, widely aired on television and subsequently published, have attracted enormous popular support. Architects once again find themselves under siege from the general public - with a new and influential champion. Arguing that the debate instigated by Prince Charles has been one sided, the author attempts to show that the arguments against his profession have been fuelled by ignorance and prejudice. High rise housing failed, it is argued, because architects were “not” involved, and community architecture, glamourised by the Prince, has drowned in it’s own publicity according to the author.</p>
<p>Great job everyone. I should receive a copy of The Prince of Wales: Right or Wrong? today. Will keep everyone posted!</p>
<p>Still haven’t found the architecture passage. Can anyone remember a phrase or other clue?</p>
<p>So, I’m assuming there will be quite a generous curve on the CR because of the architecture passage…</p>
<p>Anyone have any clue as to how much it will be curved?
Also, different tests/sections are curved differently based on difficulty/how well people did on it, right?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Yes. For example, the journalist version and the other version should have different curves (though it’s not impossible that the curves are the exact same).</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I’m not too sure about this. The architecture passage was one of the easier ones I’ve encountered and I’m in no way a CR person.</p>
<p>quote:
I’m not too sure about this. The architecture passage was one of the easier ones I’ve encountered and I’m in no way a CR person.</p>
<p>^Are you talking about the architecture passage with Prince Charles/modern architecture/where one of the questions had to do with the author “failing” to explain something?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>That exact one.</p>