<p>I hope collegeboard knows how silly that architecture thing is…</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I also got that.</p>
<p>noppee architecture is real cold war is exp
i know ;(</p>
<p>I JUST TOOK THE TEST
here are the questions i remember</p>
<p>the double passage one:</p>
<p>passage 2 is neg. 1 is pos.
cover: i forgot but something about writing about people</p>
<p>sentence comp:</p>
<p>popular president
prodigious sources
prominent…something</p>
<p>seismic anyone?</p>
<p>so if a passage is real (not experimental) then does everyone get it? because i don’t remember doing a cold war passage…</p>
<p>So I guess I did the passages below: (long passages)</p>
<ol>
<li>arcitecture</li>
<li>astronomy + story</li>
<li>the journalism</li>
<li>Cold War</li>
</ol>
<p>it seems that I have 4 CR sections, which means one must be the experimental…but I didn’t see the boxing one… oh lord how can it happen…</p>
<p>what’s the astronomy one?</p>
<p>there could be more than one type of exp
it seems boxing and cold war was experiemtna;</p>
<p>what was the passage about the cold war and astronomy? can somebody elaborate on the storyline? :(</p>
<p>Anyone who HAS taken the SAT before who IS confident about his answers? It’s like a bunch of kids running around crying over how hard each question was and how unsure they are about stuff. We need some real men here.</p>
<p>i didnt have boxing or cold war…and i had 4 sections of rding…hm</p>
<p>Anyone get “parity” in one of their answers for journalism one? Also, did you get that the passages gave reasons for a recent phenomena (sp)?</p>
<p>I think I failed CR because of the architecture passage. ;(</p>
<p>mathsci94, Yes, i have the “parity”.</p>
<p>^I had parity as well.</p>
<p>@mike the chimp, for real men 
So far:
so New and Big Media was like objective
electric power plant for not object to
parity somewhere
Seva q1 physical past
seva–conspicuous because it said it filled up half the page in the magazine.
Regarding the common problems: list of examples
Cold–impersonal</p>
<p>Reason for real phenomenon, what was the other choice to this?
difference between the two journalism passages- passage 1 was positive while passage 2 was negative.</p>
<p>What was similar between the two journalism passages regarding public involvement?–I put that public involvement was becoming commonplace
covered for journalism - write about
journalism author 2 use diff view point
Protest on campus “too convient” = only for college admin
Curious archecture = snobbish</p>
<p>sent comp:
foster
disputable or manifest (not sure)
fluctuations
prolific
ubiqutious
popular president
prodigious sources
prominent…something
add guy and check please</p>
<p>Were there two different test versions for this exam again?</p>
<p>“Seva q1 physical past”
was that something about creating an evocation?</p>
<p>what was the answer for the one in architecture that asked you to choose one of their examples </p>
<p>answers were like</p>
<p>electronics factory
shopping mall
houses
museum of arts in DC</p>
<p>i put the factory</p>