<p>
</p>
<p>I picked satire…topsy-turvy (w.tf to the second word) and nostalgic…ambitious (for the athlete). I don’t remember empirical.</p>
<p>Just adding on to what passages I had… </p>
<p>I remember:
Boxing
Architecture (***)
Milky Way or something
Journalism
the askseva one (pretty hard imo)</p>
<p>I dont NOT remmeber the cold war one at all… i dont htink I had it.</p>
<p>im pretty certain empirical was an option, but wasn’t right</p>
<p>I chose SATIRE as well, because the second part of hte sentence I thought was a dead giveaway, I wasnt sure though b/c topsy-turvy made no sense to me.</p>
<p>I had nostalgic in there somewhere as well…</p>
<p>the hesienberg was experimental
@314159265
i picked manifest
there was only one objective/objectable answer so we’re right either way</p>
<p>also what was the eclipsed question</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>No, (B) was entrenched, (D) and (E) were objective and objectionable (I don’t remember order) and the other 2 choices were really damn wrong (I think one was innovative).</p>
<p>Sentence Completions Compilation:</p>
<ol>
<li>Popular - president (can anyone confirm?)</li>
<li>Prolific - writer</li>
<li>Prominent</li>
<li>Ingenious - clever and almost</li>
<li>Fluctuation</li>
<li>Ubiquitous</li>
<li>Eclipsed</li>
<li>Disputable</li>
<li>Foster</li>
<li>Pigment (can anyone confirm)</li>
<li>Rancorous - a person’s tone</li>
<li>Enigmatic - Konigsburg novel</li>
<li>Satire - a topsy turvey world</li>
<li>Nostalgic - for past and ambitious for future</li>
</ol>
<p>314159265, i put rancorous too.</p>
<p>ugh, i already got 4 wrong aldkjfkld
ahahaha you guys know i’m going to be checking this obsessively until the 21st, right?</p>
<p>^Quick question: is this for both CR forms? I don’t recognize some of the answers.</p>
<p>i never got eclipsed. different forms? I don’t think i got many cr wrong (aside from the konigsburg novel) and i don’t recognize a few</p>
<p>are you SURE? i chose the only object- starting word, i chose objectionable btw… i remember now… i don’t remember seeing objective… was it a synomym?</p>
<p>Does anyone know where I can find the source for the Journalism passage 2 article? It was the one AGAINST New Media</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I’m 100% positive. I remember taking out A and C first. Then I took out B (entrenched) since New Media was, well, new. I then decided that objective wasn’t right b/c Passage 2’s author just *****es on and on about how New Media doesn’t follow rules and blah blah blah. Objectionable was the only one that fit; Passage 1 admitted that Big Media was bad and Passage 2 just really f—ing hates New Media.</p>
<p>that answer was not entenched… the answer was both viewed the new media/ big media as objectionable</p>
<p>i think a bunch of those vocabs are wrong</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I agree completely.</p>
<p>did any1 remember putting “development” for an answer? it was for the science passage</p>
<p>and also “hopeful eagerness” and “intelectual adventureness” for the scientific passage as well</p>
<p>alright 
let’s see. I remember most of the architecture.
-the writer and prince both viewed modernistic architecture as tasteless (something like that)
-the writer included the reader for the first time in paragraph 2 or something
-in paragraph 3, he never gave a solution to the problem of ugly office buildings
-modernist building would look best in an electronic area/industrial city
-modernism moved from egalitarianism to snobbish
-companies create tv shows to appear cultured
anything else?</p>
<p>and i got those, hacker
and also development. i thought the science passage was pretty easy</p>
<p>ready4college90 - which SCs do you think are right and which do you think are wrong? They had a number of different experimental sections.</p>