December 2010 SAT Experimental

<p>i had writing experimental. my 2 writing sections were also back to back</p>

<p>My first section was cr about territorial birds and stuff. My other ones were the ones the op listed. Does that mean the first section was experimental?</p>

<p>I had CR experimental. I think it might have been the one about modernist architecture?</p>

<p>modernist architecture, unfortunately, was not experimental</p>

<p>Audacity, I had no reading about territorial birds…that must have been your experimental.</p>

<p>I also had an experimental reading.</p>

<p>My reading sections were as follows:
A Japanese businessman with a translator
A story about a guy who always gets lost (in the wilderness, in the mall, everywhere) and loves getting lost
The one about food and farms
One about a writer who learned from some old lady about exactly who develops a love for reading and who doesn’t</p>

<p>@gal i had none of those readings…</p>

<p>Can anyone who did NOT have math experimental tell me what each of the 25 minute sections entailed?</p>

<p>@kk0494
Darn. My second guess would be the cold war one?</p>

<p>@blue
potatoes from 1980-2002
crayons and coloring books
y = a(x-5)^2+b, what other point was on the parabola</p>

<p>@other I didn’t have that one, so that must be it</p>

<p>I definetly had writing experimental. Hopefully the first one was experimental because I didn’t do to well in it while I raped the second one</p>

<p>@kko is it possible we had two completely different reading tests? Because that doesn’t make much sense to me…</p>

<p>i had the back to back writing to! but i’m pretty sure I had the CR experimental, because apperently there are 2 passages that some people didn’t have</p>

<p>i had the back to back writing too! and 2 35 writing questions, so one of those is definitely the experiemental.</p>

<p>does anyone know which one it is? i really hope its the 2nd one b/c it was harder for me</p>

<p>i think the writing section about biking to work was the real one</p>

<p>Hey, my experimental was reading…don’t know if this will help…</p>

<p>…but my long writing section talked about an ancient tribe or something with someone in it who remembered everything and told stories during weddings. It was in the improving paragraphs section. </p>

<p>That definitely WASNT experimental…</p>

<p>aw noo the griots wasnt experimental :(( i was hoping the one about writing for children was the real one</p>

<p>i think i had sec 2 writing experimental , tell me if i’m correct</p>

<p>i’m in section 2 writing n the guy next to me’s doing math, i see diagrams (rectangular prism) that i do not have throughout my entire packet.</p>

<p>i had a writing section about biking to work and one about air conditioning. which one was experimental?</p>

<p>My friend and I both had writing experimentals (back to back). I had the one about CS Lewis/writing for children and then the biking to work. My friend had the CS Lewis/writing for children and something about West Africa.</p>

<p>As far as I can tell, writing for children was experimetal.</p>