<p>Hi guys does anyone remember anything for writing? I remember it being not too bad... Hmm...</p>
<p>On last problem of last writing section (the short one)... was it interested and even passionate? or interested, even passionate? it was about college students or w/e</p>
<p>Did anyone have a writing experimental? I had two 35 minute sections. I'm trying to figure out which was exp; my opening section was a 35 min writing one.</p>
<p>I remember some question that involved comparison, maybe this one is yours azn4eyes.</p>
<p>_______ Agatha Christie's novels more than ____<strong><em>'s, the correct change was putting the person's name with an apostrophe s, since "that of _</em></strong>" is not plural (those).</p>
<p>Shouldnt "in" be maintained, so still A on that last sentence correction?</p>
<p>ok this isnt the exact question, but a good example of it:</p>
<p>None of the characters in Bob's book, Prancing under the Stars, are more complex or more interesting that the character of Lucy.</p>
<p>my question is that isn't the antecedent of "are" "none"?
and if so, is "none" a plural or singular noun, cuz:
singular --> "is"
plural --> "are"</p>
<p>i know that "characters" (which might trick some people into thinking the subject is plural) is not the antecedent because it is contained inside the prepositional phrase "of characters"</p>
<p>it's interested IN and passionate about because it's not right if it's interested, even passionate about because that would mean its saying interested ABOUT and that doesnt make sense. idk do you guys get me? i feel like i sound stupid right now</p>
<p>but that one had commas and it might be right but i think that using and sounds the best..i was looking for interested in and passionate about..that would have been the clear choice</p>