<p>Smile614</p>
<p>What has caused the most consternation among those deferred and rejected is a fundamental misunderstanding of exactly what Yale is trying to achieve in their admissions process.</p>
<p>In reality, Yale (and most other Ivies) could fill their incoming class more than several times over with nothing but applicants with 4.0s and 2400s but in their words, "that would be a very boring class." One thing that they stressed over and over when we visited and in info sessions was that they strive to admit a class that is "interesting".....again their words not mine. If you read the letter of admission that has been posted in other threads by several people you will see that they actually used the word "interesting" to describe the admitted students.</p>
<p>It is important to keep one thing in mind, and I really do know that this is difficult to do, but admissions to Yale (or any other highly selective school) really is a crap shoot at best. At one Yale info session we attended (we went to four in two years) we were told that over 95 % of all applicants are truly qualified (on paper...GPA/scores) for admission to Yale. When you consider that the admit rate is somewhere around 7-8% historically that means that 92 to 93 % of the 95% of the highly qualified applicants do not get accepted. </p>
<p>I have gotten to know a former Ivy admission rep very well in the years since my son applied to Yale. He worked at both Yale and Penn. What I am about to say is factual from his experience at Yale.</p>
<p>He has told me that the process is far more difficult than one would imagine because on paper there are so many candidates that are truly indistinguishable from each other. Couple that with what can be almost stereotypical ECs for certain groups (he cited the example of Asians who have played piano or violin since age 4, play chess, tennis or are fencers, have virtually all their APs in math and science and whose essays are also all alike and it truly becomes mind numbing. This becomes even more difficult for that particular subset because of the sheer number of Asians who apply and compete with each other for a limited number of spots.</p>
<p>In EA they are looking for people who truly stand out, not just in raw numbers because virtually every app they look at has numbers worthy of admission. They read every application a minimum of two times and rate them on a 1-10 scale. 9s and 10s are admits without question...they don't require committee review, 7s and 8s will sometimes go to another reading before the committee and and 6s are automatically going to another reading before the committee. Anything below a 6 must have a compelling reason to go before the committee for review.</p>
<p>Essays are far more important to the process than anyone believes because they are the ONLY way that an ADCOM has to humanize the person behind the numbers. In every single acceptance letter that my son received, even from Yale, he had a hand written comment about how much they enjoyed his essays and all commented about his short essay which was quite humorous and in all honesty scared me to death when he submitted it!</p>
<p>When you think about the sheer enormity of the process, 5500 plus SCEA apps this year to be read and processed by December 15th by a group of about 11 or 12 admissions reps. Each essay is read at least twice so the number is now 11,000 essays at a minimum. That represents almost 1000 apps per committee member. I was told that they all start to look very much alike and almost formulaic. The essays that really stand out, that make the admissions rep want to meet that person are the ones that go to the top of the pile and help them sift through the maze of look alike applications. These are the ones that are accepted; the next best are deferred and the ones that just don't find a way to separate themselves from the rest of look-a-likes are rejected. On top of all of this, because it is an EA decision and is not binding they have to think about yield, about over-filling the class etc since they still have another 15,000 plus applicants to review for RD and are still limited to a class size of about 1300 incoming students. With Harvard and Princeton doing away with all early programs they also know that some are using EA to "game" the H & P process.</p>
<p>If you think you are a good and interesting candidate, especially for your part of the country, apply....you really do have nothing to lose. A person who is outright rejected in EA would not have fared better in RD and the odds for admission in EA are a bit higher although it really is a more self selecting pool. A deferral allows for a second look; it essentially says we like you a lot and we just want to see what the rest of the applicants look like before we make a final decision.</p>
<p>Remember at Yale in particular, they are looking for "interesting people" to make up an "interesting class" not just for high achievers who have resumes that look like they were built for college admission. They really do want well rounded people who have had some fun along the way, who know how to laugh, especially at themselves, and who have not spent their entire lives solely prepping for Ivy admission.</p>