<p>Hi, I’m wondering if anyone, especially ED applicants, sent in ACT’s only, without SAT II’s. Has anyone gotten feedback from Brown or GC’s about whether SAT II’s should be sent in to supplement the ACT’s even though they are not required. (Here, the ACT was significantly better than the SAT I, so is it worth sending solid SAT II’s to supplement if it means exposing good but not great SAT I’s?)</p>
<p>I sent the ACTs. I did not take any SAT IIs.</p>
<p>I did exactly what you are talking about, but I applied RD. I had good SAT II's and a great ACT, but a bad SAT I. I took the SAT II's because I figured it couldn't hurt. I'm assuming they will just take the highest score between ACT and SAT. For me it was worth it to send the SAT II's because they were good scores.</p>
<p>I did the same thing as Scurf. On the application itself I didn't fill out my SAT I scores, only my ACT (34, better than my SAT) and my SAT IIs</p>
<p>If you report SAT II's, doesn't it automatically force you to send in any SAT I's you took also?</p>
<p>Yes, but I'm hoping they'll only consider what I reported on the application.</p>