<p>SAT I math: 790
IIC: 760</p>
<p>I took the IIC over a year ago, and didn't fully prepare xP..but oh well...at that time i thought 760 wasn't so bad.</p>
<p>SAT I Math: 770<br>
SATII IIC: 800</p>
<p>Retaking SATI though. I hate SAT I Math, which doesn't test much actual math, and I hate the curve. I have to work on avoiding careless errors.</p>
<p>A friend got 740 SAT I and 780 SATII IIC.</p>
<p>SAT I Math: 790 (one question wrong. ONE QUESTION AWAY FROM 800...gawd T__T)
SAT II Math IIC: 800 (lol and it's just 90th percentile...really low curve)</p>
<p>I think most people do better on IIC just because the curve for Math IIC is super low. </p>
<p>I see so many ACT Math scores... I got 35?</p>
<p>SAT I math: 790
IIC: 760</p>
<p>SAT1: 800
IIC: 800</p>
<p>IIC is a lot easier to 800... I omitted like 2 questions and probably got one wrong. Took this test twice because I was drunk the first time and didn't do as well (long story...).</p>
<p>I took the SAT1 a few times and was only able to 800 it once (the other times I had like 790 and 740). Really, the SAT1 curve is so erratic that sometimes you get a high score and sometimes you don't (the 800 was getting none wrong, the 790 was one wrong, and the 740 was two wrong. Sometimes it's just a tossup with math).</p>
<p>The verbal curve on the SAT is erratic too, but that might not be true for the new SAT.</p>
<p>Yeah some people only miss like 3-4 (sometimes even 5) and still get an 800. One time I miss just 5 CR (everything else perfect) and get a 740. Go figure (very very bad curve for that test though). Should have near 1600 but alas I don't care haha/a little bitter/meh/etc/etc.</p>
<p>I still remember the exact question that cost me the 1600, and even though it shouldn't bother me anymore, perhaps that is one of the things I regret most...not thinking more about that question.</p>
<p>SAT 1 Math - 800
II C - 760</p>
<p>Hm. SAT I: 700. IIC: 800. Everyone else seems to have had less of a difference =p</p>