Something I’ve seen come up a lot lately as my friends are looking at credit they may get for IB or AP courses is the differences between the amounts given for each. Each school does it differently, but my observation is that it’s either:
- No credit for anything, at all. (think most selective)
- Some credit for med-high scores.
- Only allows you to skip ahead in classes, no credit given.
I can see the reasonableness of all three options for both IB and AP credit, but I have trouble understanding when universities give credit for AP but not comparable IB SL courses. Let’s take AP Chemistry and IB Chemistry as an example.
Here is an example AP Chemistry syllabus from CB: http://www.collegeboard.com/html/apcourseaudit/courses/pdfs/chemistry-sample-syllabus-1-id-1029708v1.pdf
Topics covered include equilibrium, rates of reaction, gas laws, enthalpy, VSEPR, acids and bases, etc.
An example IB SL Chemistry class syllabus: http://www.holyhearthigh.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Chemistry-Guide.pdf (skip to p. 41)
Similar topics covered, maybe gas laws not in-depth but with an added option like biochemistry, etc.
The HL class covers the same topics but more in-depth than either AP Chem or IB SL chem as it functions like a third-year chemistry class.
Credit given varies greatly between the three courses. Some specific policies for CC popular universities (all for colleges of arts and sciences or equivalent):
Duke: 1 credit for AP 4/5, ? credit for IB HL 6/7
Northwestern: 1 credit for AP 3, 4 credits for AP 4/5; 1 credit for IB HL 5/6, 4 credits for IB HL 7
U Michigan: 4 credits for AP 4/5; 5 credits for IB HL 4 and 8 credits for IB HL 5+
UNC: 5 credits for AP 3, 8 credits for AP 5; 5 credits for IB HL 5+
U Virginia: 6 credits for AP 4/5, 6 credits for IB HL 5+
Swarthmore: AP 5 or IB HL 6/7 allows chance to skip ahead, no credits
Obviously just a sampling, and these are all selective schools. Some of these policies seem more balanced than others, but some seem to favor AP. IB SL courses seem to be dismissed.
Some things to also think about: a 6/7 on an IB test is, IMO, harder than a 5 on an AP test and significantly harder than a 4. IB tests are usually all writing (exception Chem Paper 1). AP tests have stricter time limits. AP tests are also one part, while IB are often three or four, including a project. IB students are limited to 3 (in rare cases 4) HL classes.
I’d like to hear thoughts. I’m not meaning for this to be any sort of attack on AP or IB, just a look at the discrepancies in credit given, especially for SL classes that have very similar curricula to AP classes. I’m biased, obviously, because I took full IB. However, I’ve also taken a few AP classes, so I’m interested in the comparison.