<p>Here’s our official line:</p>
<p>"The relationship between student and mentor forms the centerpiece of any musician’s education. Consequently, the Conservatory encourages and always provides advice lessons at no cost to all accepted students prior to making a commitment to attend Bard. For prospective students, advice lessons are available on a case-by-case basis. In most instances the student will need to submit a recent CD or DVD prior to a campus visit. The faculty member and the prospective student will also need to arrange a fee. "
[Bard</a> College Conservatory of Music | Frequently Asked Questions: Is it possible to schedule a lesson with one of your faculty?](<a href=“http://www.bard.edu/conservatory/faqs/#faq868561]Bard”>http://www.bard.edu/conservatory/faqs/#faq868561)</p>
<p>At Bard, none of the faculty teach as their main, full-time job. There are also no quotas, no policy saying the teacher must have a certain number of students to remain employed. At schools where the faculty have an appointment as assistant, associate, or full professor, the nature of their employment usually entails a contractual understanding that “you will teach a mixture of 14 undergraduate and graduate students, coach a woodwind quintet, and teach one additional course in orchestral repertoire” or something to that effect. If the school is in a college town, and the faculty live and work there full-time (regardless of other outside commitments, soloing, etc. their home zip code closely matches the school’s), then it’s plausible that some would regularly offer lessons gratis. </p>
<p>But supply and demand dictates that it’s unrealistic to expect a very busy musician, someone holding down a successful performing career and teaching responsibilities at 2 universities, one pre-college division, and a small private studio, to provide lessons at no cost to any prospective student that stops by campus. The same would apply, generally, to full-time faculty with limited outside activity, because the university is going to get the maximum commitment possible out of their full-time employee. </p>
<p>We have our policy because, in fact, we often get calls from people in CT, NJ, MA, and NY where they say “hey I’m on spring break this week and I’m coming to Bard tomorrow can I have a lesson with Peter Serkin at 2pm?” Our response to this situation is found in the policy stated above–we bend over backwards to give accepted students face time and free lessons with faculty (in some limited cases we have even subsidized travel to Bard), as it is usually the most important factor in the decision to attend. </p>
<p>For prospective students, though, the best process involves advance planning, and budgeting for the cost of lessons. I mentioned earlier a cellist from Wyoming who wanted a lesson with Peter Wiley. He sent in a one-page resume and a DVD of his playing two months in advance, and we set up a lesson for him. (He was prepared to pay for the lesson, but Peter had such a good time meeting him money never came up.) And while he came on his spring break, he also made sure that was a good week to see us–it wasn’t OUR spring break as well, and since we’re just under 100 students we don’t have recitals every single day like a school with a BM-DMA continuum, our activity comes in waves. I’m sure this cellist made the most of his time and had lessons in Boston and NYC as well.</p>
<p>So at least for us the planning-ahead approach seems the best way to balance the need for prospective students to get a solid feel for a school with the fact that interest and demand can often far outstrip supply vis a vis faculty time. And be prepared to pay, and then be pleasantly surprised when you don’t. </p>
<p>But like I said I can definitely envision a different kind of arrangement at a school in a college town with full-time faculty, but even then I’m certain supply and demand max out the higher up the food chain you travel in terms of volume of prospective students. Hans Jensen may teach at Northwestern full-time, but I can’t imagine him offering lessons free of charge either. Same thing for Bloomington, Potsdam, Ann Arbor, Oberlin, Appleton, Denton, etc. etc. </p>
<p>I’m also not sure if it’s fair to write off a school simply because an advice lesson didn’t work out. How you’re treated by the office of admission during the process of getting a lesson could give you insight into the school’s administrative culture, but every year many students end up perfectly happy at a school they auditioned for based on other investigations (college fairs, online, overall reputation) and without having a lesson in advance. And I can say that without question, an advance lesson does not tip the scale in favor of a particular applicant. It may help with nerves on the part of the student to feel more comfortable, not playing to a room of total strangers, but any music school with integrity is going to weigh each audition equally, on merit. So don’t feel like you have to have lessons with all eight teachers on your list of possible schools in order to have an edge or a leg-up in the audition. An advance lesson can help in cases where you aren’t sure whether to apply, but if it’s clear you’re going to put in an application to the school anyway, why bend over backwards and shell out a ton of money in your junior year just to meet with a teacher who can only see you on this particular day and time? The office of admission will tell you, in its information session, what they’re looking for, and how to get in to their school. And they’re always around. As for that teacher you’re pretty sure you’d want to study with, wait until you’ve actually been accepted, and then go and kick the tires if necessary.</p>
<p>Perhaps most revealing will be how the school and the teacher treat you once you’re admitted and the tables are turned! You all bit your nails waiting for April 1st but I’m now biting mine. At least until tomorrow.</p>