<p>How hard do you guys think it was?
If you guys took the 2002 released one, do you think it was harder or easier?
Do you think this can possibly affect the curve?</p>
<p>I got owned. big time.</p>
<p>I just hope I got at least 55+ MC right...</p>
<p>I think the MC on the 2002 released test was easier than this one, but I thought the essays on today's test were easy (except I probably messed up the Part B section).</p>
<p>so a possible curve change from the 78-120 for a 5 in 2002?</p>
<p>The essay's were all bad topics. One I didn't know what it was until after the exam. The MC was pretty easy though.</p>
<p>I did this course as a self-study for about 4 weeks, and I was owned by the essays and i left seven multiple choice blank, seven!</p>
<p>my policy is never to leave any MC blank
it gives me a sense of non-accomplishment
and even if u do guess randomly, it should still come out even theoretically</p>
<p>I hated the DBQ -- took too long to read so I spent less time on the other essays.</p>
<p>MC was easier than Princeton, harder than Barron's, but it got way harder as it went on and I got owned by the charts and pictures, especially one picture which I thought was absolutely ridiculous with what you had to know. Everyone walked out saying, what the hell was that? You can probably guess which one it was.</p>
<p>waffle
lmfao i know exactly what question ur talking about</p>
<p>omg... now i think of it i think i numbered my essays wrong
i did 1,3,2 in that order, and i think i labeled them 1,2,3
will this affect my score?</p>
<p>I liked the random question on sheep.</p>
<p>I don't think it was too bad. Some of the MC was hard (I answered all of them). The DBQ wasn't that good either. The other too essays weren't that bad.</p>
<p>The MC was ridiculously easy. The essays weren't as easy, but my organization sucked.</p>
<p>Piece of cake,</p>
<p>Multiple-Choice= EASY (effed up on the easiest question though and one of the pictures wasn't clear enough.)</p>
<p>DBQ= worst DBQ ever.</p>
<p>COT= Ok.</p>
<p>Comparitive= Good.</p>
<p>i don't see why you say the dbq was so bad?</p>
<p>I couldn't find an effective grouping system. Also, I believe mostly every document explained a different effect, which was hard to right a universal thesis. I'm usually good at DBQs too. My mind blanked out for 20 mins, and it took me 30 mins to start writing on the worst essays i've ever written in my whole life.</p>
<p>I almost crying during one of the essays. Gaaah... I studied so hard just to do horribly. I hate that.</p>
<p>well a good way to group things (and this is NOT breaking confidentiality cuz it applies to any and all dbqs you need to group) is SOCIAL POLITICAL ECONOMIC</p>
<p>be it effects, causes, responses.</p>
<p>this is thanks to zg80 who i immed during a slight essay panic last night</p>
<p>well i thought MC was easier than in the 2002 test, but maybethats just cuz i crammed allllllll day yesterday and this morning alot too</p>
<p>i thoguht the DBQ wwas pretty simple even tho i spent an hour on it lol</p>
<p>i thought essay c was easier than b, but both i didnt have enough detail in</p>
<p>im praying for a 5, expecting a 4, and if i get a 3 ill be kinda unhappy but i guess it wouldnt be the end of hte world</p>